Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clock King
And for the record, many East Indians and Arabs and Australians are darker than we are (in the US), and I wouldn't call them “Black”.

Any person with dark (black) skin in America would be called “African American”. Although the look of confusion on American faces when a thick British ascent comes out of an “African Americans” mouth is priceless.

Thats the danger of trying to assign Nationality on the basis of skin color. Personally, I think calling someone a (fill in the blanc based on apparent ethnicity) Americans is deplorable. In my humble opinion there should only be one kind of American, and that is an American.

It’s beating a dead horse, and just about a pointless point to make. Black’s in America are “African American” even if they are Australian, or Persian, or East Indian and just here on vacation.

Just as a personal point, as a boy I lived for a number of years in Africa, England, and Jamaica, and as a naturalized citizen, I am just a little bewildered with the PC habit of labeling people with black skin as “African American”.

51 posted on 09/26/2007 12:38:00 PM PDT by chaos_5 (... I'm just another angry white male ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: chaos_5; Clock King
Black’s in America are “African American” even if they are Australian, or Persian, or East Indian and just here on vacation.

Which is why a cat like Tiger Woods, who is mostly Asian, and maybe 1/4 "black" is "African American" as far as the liberal media is concerned. Unless Nike or Fuzzy Zoeller are around, I've never heard Tiger refer to himself as anything other than a golfer.

63 posted on 09/26/2007 12:55:08 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson