Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA aims to put man on Mars by 2037
breitbart. ^ | Sep 24

Posted on 09/24/2007 10:41:14 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares

NASA aims to put a man on Mars by 2037, the administrator of the US space agency indicated here Monday. This year marks the half-century of the space age ushered in by the October 1957 launch of the Sputnik-1 by the then Soviet Union, NASA administrator Michael Griffin noted.

In 2057, the centenary of the space era, "we should be celebrating 20 years of man on Mars," Griffin told an international astronautics congress in this southern Indian city where he outlined NASA's future goals.

The international space station being built in orbit and targeted for completion by 2010 would provide a "toehold in space" from where humanity can travel first to the moon and then to Mars, Griffin said.

"We are looking at the moon and Mars to build a civilisation for tomorrow and after that," Griffin added in his remarks at a conference session attended by heads of the world's space agencies.

President George W. Bush in 2004 announced an ambitious plan for the US to return to the moon by 2020 and use it as a stepping stone for manned missions to Mars and beyond.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: 2037; mars; nasa; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: taxcontrol

He3 is a myth. Even if it were feasible it wouldn’t be a minor operation.


41 posted on 09/24/2007 11:15:26 AM PDT by RightWhale (25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

“At some point, shouldn’t we explore other locations to settle off this rock?”

Just as people left their home continents to settle on others. It is the same. Different challenges, same pressures, same human drive. And why we are so sucessful as a species today, over 6 billion strong.
It cannot be suppressed, it is what we are to do these things.


42 posted on 09/24/2007 11:18:04 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

There’s no air. It’s cold and dark. While we could populate the entire galaxy in a million years, we won’t.


43 posted on 09/24/2007 11:23:53 AM PDT by RightWhale (25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Complete scam, and waste of taxpayer’s money. Nothing can live
there.
NASA is the Fed. gov’ts folly just like light rail is to the
cities that don’t need it.


44 posted on 09/24/2007 11:23:57 AM PDT by Fireone (Duncan Hunter for (Vice) President '08! - gohunter08.com Fred Thompson/Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Yes, exactly.

I am one who believes that it’s rather unlikely we’ll ever find intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.

The intelligent life on other planets will be US. We may find that most solar systems outside our own have one or two planets that, with a little push and some techonology, could be mostly self-sustaining livable planets with our help.

Alpha Centauri system for example - if it has planets, both the A and B stars are of the right temperature and output range to possibly support a habitable planet.


45 posted on 09/24/2007 11:24:03 AM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NeilGus

we need to do things like this for the sake of pure research. we easily obtained 10 times the cost of the moon project in side-benefits and offshoots.

saying you don’t see why we have to do something is like saying we already know everything we ever will


46 posted on 09/24/2007 11:24:36 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Good! I should live long enough to see it!

Why? Do you have any idea of how much this will cost or who will pay for it or how useless it is from a scientific viewpoint?

47 posted on 09/24/2007 11:27:22 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
2037-the man they choose for this mission likely hasn’t even been born yet.

Great observation.


Don't know about that. The youngest man to walk on the moon was 36. Average age was pretty close to 40.
48 posted on 09/24/2007 11:28:10 AM PDT by zencat (The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NeilGus

What a joke. It took us less than a decade to get to the moon with technology that’s over forty years old. If NASA is saying it will take thirty years to get to mars, you can count on it taking at least sixty, and costing ten times more than what they say.


49 posted on 09/24/2007 11:29:16 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NeilGus
re: I don’t see the point of sending humans just to say we can.)))

Pilots just wanna have fun. Or watch other pilots having fun. Pay up.

50 posted on 09/24/2007 11:29:35 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Those are valid points. Private industry could do what needs to be in outer space in resource development. This ‘pure science’ thing is a scam: there is no science being done in space. If our Global Masters wanted us in outer space they would repeal the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and allow private property rights.


51 posted on 09/24/2007 11:30:19 AM PDT by RightWhale (25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I’ll be 82. Saw Neil Armstrong plant his 9 1/2 double E on the moon. Might be around to see someone else do the same thing on Mars.


52 posted on 09/24/2007 11:32:15 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (PUT AN END TO ORGANIZED CRIME. ABOLISH THE I.R.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NeilGus

Then I guess it’s a really good thing you’re not in such a decision making position to prevent it, isn’t it? Yep. Manned space flight is the next step the HUMAN race should be taking. People with short sight and narrow minds are the bane of making progress.


53 posted on 09/24/2007 11:32:52 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://realitycheck.blogsome.com - and yes, yes, I'm a "FredHead". Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares; Millee; Allegra; carlr; Maximus of Texas; EX52D; StephenTX; wallcrawlr; ...
I was 10... when Sputnik went up--

I was a swinging 22... when we landed on the moon--

Gadzooks! Now, I have to wait until I'm frigging 90... for us to get to Mars!

Guess I picked the wrong day... to give up beer drinking!

54 posted on 09/24/2007 11:34:06 AM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

When our sun burns out it will do no good to hide on Mars or the moon.


55 posted on 09/24/2007 11:38:07 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
we need to do things like this for the sake of pure research.

Pure research is great... but the people pushing for a manned mission to Mars are not interested in pure research. You get far more research for far less money from unmanned probes. NASA, for example, has two probes which have spent the last four years exploring the planet, has a high resolution satellite taking pictures of every inch of the surface, and has another probe, the Phoenix Lander, en route. There is no research that humans can do that probes can't do better and for less money, and lots of research that humans can't do that probes can do.

we easily obtained 10 times the cost of the moon project in side-benefits and offshoots.

The enormous value of orange-flavored Tang aside, I don't agree with your assessment. If there was any scientific benefit at all from Apollo, it was likely negligible.

56 posted on 09/24/2007 11:39:22 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

They are not doing science in space. At first it seemed like they were, but they have sent probes to most of the planets and moons already and where are the results of science aside from some pictures to look at and forget? They are doing engineering, but why if we are not going out there ourselves?


57 posted on 09/24/2007 11:43:09 AM PDT by RightWhale (25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"there is no science being done in space"

Rubbish.

Hubble telescope. Solar, planetary, comet probes. Mars rovers. Microgravity effects on everything from ball bearings to biology. Materials testing. New propulsion systems. There's science being done in nearly every field imaginable.
58 posted on 09/24/2007 11:45:22 AM PDT by zencat (The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
What a joke. It took us less than a decade to get to the moon with technology that’s over forty years old.

You should probably give this comment a bit of thought before you call it "a joke."

Getting to people into orbit is a couple of orders of magnitude more difficult than launching a suborbital mission. Getting them to the moon for a couple of weeks is a couple of orders of magnitude beyond getting to orbit.

Getting people to Mars for a couple of years is more than a couple of orders of magnitude more difficult than getting to the moon in Apollo style.

The distances, times, and required infrastructure to do it are significantly greater than anything we've done before.

59 posted on 09/24/2007 11:47:53 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
NASA aims to put man on Mars by 2037

That's nice. He'll be able to take a tour of the 15-year-old Chinese base. ;)

60 posted on 09/24/2007 11:49:34 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson