Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA aims to put man on Mars by 2037
breitbart. ^ | Sep 24

Posted on 09/24/2007 10:41:14 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares

NASA aims to put a man on Mars by 2037, the administrator of the US space agency indicated here Monday. This year marks the half-century of the space age ushered in by the October 1957 launch of the Sputnik-1 by the then Soviet Union, NASA administrator Michael Griffin noted.

In 2057, the centenary of the space era, "we should be celebrating 20 years of man on Mars," Griffin told an international astronautics congress in this southern Indian city where he outlined NASA's future goals.

The international space station being built in orbit and targeted for completion by 2010 would provide a "toehold in space" from where humanity can travel first to the moon and then to Mars, Griffin said.

"We are looking at the moon and Mars to build a civilisation for tomorrow and after that," Griffin added in his remarks at a conference session attended by heads of the world's space agencies.

President George W. Bush in 2004 announced an ambitious plan for the US to return to the moon by 2020 and use it as a stepping stone for manned missions to Mars and beyond.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: 2037; mars; nasa; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: RockinRight
I say let’s go to Mars and terraform it to a livable planet.

Sounds good... I was looking for something to do next Saturday. And I bet we could cover our costs with raffle tickets and maybe a bingo night or two.

21 posted on 09/24/2007 10:55:22 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Why spend gazillions on something that's been done before?

At least according to Sheila Jackson Lee.

22 posted on 09/24/2007 10:55:31 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Heck, I remember when NASA said they will have men on Mars by 1985!

Then 2000 ... then 2020 ... now 2037.

Private ventures are the only way to get there imo. Relying upon NASA is a guarantee of never seeing it happen.

Unless, of course, another nation starts doing it, then NASA will do it just to deny the opposition an impregnable military high ground.


23 posted on 09/24/2007 10:57:29 AM PDT by Edward Watson (Fanatics with guns beat liberals with ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

What’s the hurry?

I wonder if NASA has ever thought of a name change.

NIYL would be so much more accruate.

Not In Your Lifetime... SUCKERS!


24 posted on 09/24/2007 10:59:32 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson
Private ventures are the only way to get there imo.

Private ventures don't tend to make absurdly high risks (like a flight to Mars) for absolutely zero material gain.

Unless, of course, another nation starts doing it, then NASA will do it just to deny the opposition an impregnable military high ground.

Military high ground? What are you even talking about?

25 posted on 09/24/2007 11:01:25 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

They could save money by sending Ron Paul...

...he’s already 3/4 of the way there.


26 posted on 09/24/2007 11:02:08 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Swell. I will be 90! What a waste of intertia when we shut down after the Apollo Program.

Let's hear it for the "Great Society"!

27 posted on 09/24/2007 11:02:47 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("All gave some, and some gave all!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Outer space is not the next frontier but the only true oblivion.


28 posted on 09/24/2007 11:03:18 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
I say let’s go to Mars and terraform it to a livable planet.

I saw a documentary on that once. It was narrated by Arnold Schwarzenegger. I think it was called "Total Recall".

29 posted on 09/24/2007 11:03:39 AM PDT by T.Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

What a generation! They also killed the Superconducting Supercollider.


30 posted on 09/24/2007 11:04:18 AM PDT by RightWhale (25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

2037 is 3 years before the scheduled retirement of the B-52.


31 posted on 09/24/2007 11:07:56 AM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeilGus
I don’t see the point of sending humans just to say we can.

If humans don't get off the planet and start living other places, humanity will certainly be wiped out by an asteroid sooner or later. I like to think that my great-great . . . grandson would survive because we are off the planet. Going to Mars with humans is a key step in that process.

32 posted on 09/24/2007 11:08:27 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

LOL!

Well, I didn’t say it would be cheap or fast! Just technically feasible.


33 posted on 09/24/2007 11:08:47 AM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NeilGus; All

“I don’t see the point of sending humans just to say we can.”

NASA enables astronauts to bring back the visions of space, they bring back what its like to see our earth as an outsider. They bring back what its like to be a child of earth. To see our world as it truly is, an oasis in a vast black expanse.

They take human presence beyond our world. They teach us that the sky is not the limit, that there ARE no limits.

They keep an American/western world presence in space. If we dont. Someone else will most certainly take the lead. China is seeking the high ground now.

There are reasons why this nation is where it is today. Reasons why any of us are here at all. Brave people took the risks and went beyond the horizon. They did so on ships they knew may not return and on imperfect wings.

“A ship in harbor is safe — but that is not what ships are built for.” -John A. Shedd

The oceans are littered with vessels of discovery.

Astronaut Story Musgrave.....

“We have been a frontier culture. We were born out of exploration, we were born out of adventure. We were born out of the plains and the mountains. We’ve been a very physical kind of culture. And so, if you look at adventure, if you look at exploration, if you look at immersion in nature, a physical culture, and all those things, you can see directly how space flight relates to the way America has been born and how it evolved.”

“You have to keep pushing the frontier not just because it’s there, but because that’s how we find things that end up changing humanity,” -Paul Hill, Mission Control

Why Space, Why Explore? Astronaut Story Musgrave...........

We have no choice, Sir. It is the Nature of Humanity, it is the Nature of Life

The Globe was created and Life Evolved, and you look at every single cubic millimeter on this Earth, You can go 30,000 feet down below the Earth surface, You can go 40,000 feet up in the air and Life is There. When you look at the globe down there, you see Teeming Life Everywhere

It is the Power of Life, And maybe I am not just a Human up here, you know. Now Life is Leaping off the Planet. It is heading to other parts of the Solar System, other parts of the Universe

There are those kinds of Pressures. It isn’t simply politics, it is not simply technology, it is really not just the essence of humanity, but it is sort of also, you could look at it as maybe the Essence of Life. I think Teilhard de Chardin, in Phenomenon of Man, I believe he put that incredibly well. So those kind of Forces are at Work. It is the nature of humans to be exploratory and to Push On

Yes, it costs resources and it does cost a lot, and there is a risk, there is a penalty, there is a down side, but Exploration and Pioneering, I think those are the critical things, it is the Essence of what Human Beings are, and that is to try to understand their Universe and to try to participate in the entire Universe and not just their little Neighborhood -Story Musgrave

One of my most convincing arguments for space exploration is the analogy that Earth itself is a spacecraft. Everything we learn about how to function and live in space applies directly to our spacehip Earth. How to recycle air, water, how to generate and use power efficiently, how to grow food in closed ecosystems. All of it is important. All of this can benefit mankind in a world with a fast growing population. Understanding other worlds is how we understand OUR world better, to understand how it formed and where it is going. Its our only home for now.

“We must not cease from exploration, and at the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we began, and to know it for the first time.” T.S. Eliot

Gallup survey.....

“More than three-fourths (77%) of the American public say they support a newplan for space exploration that would include a stepping-stone approach to returnthe space shuttle to flight, complete assembly of the space station, build areplacement for the shuttle, go back to the Moon and then on to Mars and beyond”

Q: Why should America send astronauts to Mars?

NASA Administrator Mike Griffin ........

A: I can give you a bunch of different answers that matter to me. But why did Spain bankroll Magellan to leave port with five ships and head out around the world, two of which never made it past the Canary Islands and two more of which were lost on the way? They got one ship back three years later with something like 20 or so people out of an initial crew of 122 across all the ships. Why’d they do that? It is in the nature of humans to find, to define, to explore and to push back the frontier. And in our time, the frontier is space and will be for a very long time.

Give me a counter example to the statement I’m about to make. When the history books are written, the nations that are preeminent in their time are those nations that dominate the frontiers of their time. The failed societies are the ones that pull back from the frontier. I want our society, America, western society, to be preeminent in the world of the future and I want us not to be a failed society. And the way to do that, universally so, is to push the frontier.

Now we don’t do that with every dollar we’ve got. Obviously, most of our money has to be spent on today’s concerns. But we’re talking about something here that uses six tenths of a percent of the federal budget. This is not exactly spending money like a drunken sailor. This is an investment for our grandchildren’s grandchildren.

I could make a very good argument on the basis of economics, that the European investment in the New World didn’t pay off, really, for Europeans for 400 years. I could make an argument for you that the biggest payoff of European investment in the New World was the existence of America to bail them out of World War 2. Europe would have sunk into a dark age in the 20th century with the set of political activities and behaviors that led to World War 1 and then World War 2, which followed from that. Without the investment in the New World, there would not have been another society elsewhere on the planet to prevent Europe from falling back into a second dark age. And I could make an argument that European investment in the New World was a net loss for hundreds of years and finally was worth the effort.

These kinds of activities, as I say, they’re not large in the grand scheme of things, although it looks large when you write down the budget numbers, and they don’t pay off today. They pay off for our grandchildren’s grandchildren. And I care about that and I think everyone else should, too. -NASA Administrator Mike Griffin

A note was found from the Challenger commander in his breifcase after the accident... Excerpted from Silver Linings : Triumph of the Challenger 7. by June Scobee Rodgers and June Scobee Rogers.

“We have whole planets to explore, we have new worlds to build. We have a solar system to roam in. And if only a tiny fraction of the human race reaches out toward space, the work they do there will totally change the lives of all the billions of humans who remain on earth, just as the strivings of a handful of colonists in the new world totally changed the lives of everyone in Europe, Asia & Africa.”

Had Dick left the note in his briefcase for us to find if something happened? Did he write it on scratch paper to use to quote in a speech? All we’ll ever know is that when we most needed a message, it was there. He left for us his dream for the world, his vision for space exploration.”

The civilizations that lead on the frontier, end up dictating the course of human history.

And that work continues. New designs are being worked on and tests are beginning now. This... is what is next for NASA.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vZ8RIcmWAk

Lunar helium 3 may end up powering fusion reactors on earth someday. You never know what is going to matter and change the world.

We learned of lunar helium 3 because of our exploration efforts there.

We must push forward, challenge and improve and yes sometimes manage risk. Always.

Even as individuals. And we all know what it means when we do not do these efforts. It is no different as a nation or a species.

Please consider the above. Consider the grand picture.


34 posted on 09/24/2007 11:09:35 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I don’t think it has a strong enough magnetic field to hold an atmosphere. I don’t see a way to overcome that.


35 posted on 09/24/2007 11:10:31 AM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: T.Smith
I saw a documentary on that once. It was narrated by Arnold Schwarzenegger. I think it was called "Total Recall".

Ok, ok, very funny. Frankly, I despise you naysayers who say that terraforming Mars isn't practical just because it would take a billion years and would require many more times more money than the combined wealth of every human being on earth, and even then would probably not be possible.

36 posted on 09/24/2007 11:10:51 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
What? We can't do that!

Why think of the huge carbon footprint that would leave!!! Imagine how many trillions of tons of greenhouse gases rockets cause!!

37 posted on 09/24/2007 11:12:39 AM PDT by KenHorse (It may be the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

I’m of the opinion that a minor mining base on the moon to extract titanium and He-3 for fusion power here on earth makes more sense as a first step to a Mars base.


38 posted on 09/24/2007 11:12:59 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Your tagline is a bit off. Gravity is a fact, predictable and repeatable. The mechanisms of gravity are theory.


39 posted on 09/24/2007 11:13:45 AM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

There WILL be a time when Earth will no longer be habitable. It might be 400 million years from now, but it will happen. The sun is increasing its output over time. It varies up and down (hence Earth’s climate change over time) but as a whole, it gets hotter as it gets older. That’s what stars do and it’s due to the laws of nuclear physics.

At some point, shouldn’t we explore other locations to settle off this rock?


40 posted on 09/24/2007 11:14:18 AM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson