Sounds like a theory, not an example.
You’re looking at what IS in existance, and saying that one species developed into another.
NOT proof of speciation.
I’ve read of this observation before, and when the climate conditions changed back to “normal”, all the “species” differences also reverted to normal.
Youre looking at what IS in existance, and saying that one species developed into another.
NOT proof of speciation.
Theory? All of the populations are living, and easily examined. No theory about it. You don't believe it, go and look for yourself.
You are going to extremes to deny evidence that is clear and convincing. It seems like you are doing creation "science" rather than real science.