Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Cancer risk among users of oral contraceptives: cohort data from the Royal College of General Practitioner's oral contraception study,"is the title of the article. It's FReebie accessed on the BMJ link.
1 posted on 09/12/2007 6:38:06 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

I prefer to think of the pill as reducing the risk of abortion.


2 posted on 09/12/2007 6:41:43 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Well, that settles that! lol

The medical lords have spoken.


3 posted on 09/12/2007 6:43:15 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush in 2008; mark my words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“Taking the Pill reduces the risks of a woman getting cancer later in life, according to one of the largest studies ever undertaken.”

For some reason I don’t believe a word of this.


4 posted on 09/12/2007 6:44:13 PM PDT by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

barf alert.


5 posted on 09/12/2007 6:45:47 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Skeletal Discovery Bone Cells Affect Metabolism

Cuba Has Better Health Care than the United States?

Cholera Epidemic Infects 7,000 People in Iraq

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

8 posted on 09/12/2007 6:57:40 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I suppose it certainly cuts the risk of having a dried film of DNA on your back :-)


12 posted on 09/12/2007 7:13:55 PM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Study either makes no sense or is misleadingly reported. Short term pill use reduced cancer risk 12% later in life. BUT:

Using the pill 8 years or more INCREASED cancer risk twice as much - 22%.

Seems logical to me that 8 years is not a magic cut off point. So if you used the pill 5 years, is your risk up or down? This article says down, I wouldn't bet on it.

13 posted on 09/12/2007 7:14:44 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

On it’s face, I’m afraid I don’t find this credible. It sounds like politicized science to me. I wouldn’t trust the report until it has been thoroughly analyzed by people I can trust.


15 posted on 09/12/2007 7:19:14 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The headline is a lie. In some instances it lowered risk, after continued use it increased risks.


18 posted on 09/12/2007 8:07:02 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

**Taking the Pill cuts the risk of cancer**

I don’t think so.


20 posted on 09/12/2007 8:31:43 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I wonder what child-bearing does to the risk of cancer later in life?


33 posted on 09/14/2007 7:44:58 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, September 12, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson