All these people have done is tell a variety of welfare workers and reporters that the daddy isn't the baby-daddy. When it came right down to informing officialdom of the facts, they didn't do that ~ for some reason the woman wants welfare, wants to get the "estranged" husband off the hook for child support, and wants to let some other guy she says she's having babies by off the hook too.
Do you know how to spell welfare fraud?
Both the mother and he said he wasn't the father, and named the real father, who has had another child with her. The court confirmed a fraud which was perpetuated by DCSE. How could DCSE ask for an order against him when they had statements by both parents that he wasn't the father, and named the real father?
There's fraud here, but it's on the part of the bureaucracy, not the mother or the victim. As another poster's story confirms, no man is safe while state support workers are on the clock.
The article doesn't state, and I don't know why he didn't appear...and neither do you. Can you explain the mentality that supports blaming the victim?
Can you justify the bureaucratic mentality that pushes for a result all know to be fraudulent?