Both the mother and he said he wasn't the father, and named the real father, who has had another child with her. The court confirmed a fraud which was perpetuated by DCSE. How could DCSE ask for an order against him when they had statements by both parents that he wasn't the father, and named the real father?
There's fraud here, but it's on the part of the bureaucracy, not the mother or the victim. As another poster's story confirms, no man is safe while state support workers are on the clock.
The article doesn't state, and I don't know why he didn't appear...and neither do you. Can you explain the mentality that supports blaming the victim?
Can you justify the bureaucratic mentality that pushes for a result all know to be fraudulent?
Evidence consists of something other than the claims of the supplicants. Let’s see the blood tests and the DNA results.