[libstripper]

Looks like the Witch's campaign had all the info it needed from businessman Cassidy to run Hsu down and deliberately took no action. How could such a thing happen under the nose of the World's Most Ethical Woman??

[FormerACLUmember]

Tip of the iceberg for the Evil One. Not that the crooked media will cover one iota of this.

[gridlock]

How could such a thing happen under the nose of the World's Most Ethical Woman??

The checks cleared. What more did she need to know?

[Clara Lou]

Give ‘em time. The excuse will come.

[Enchante]

BWA HA HA HA HA...... the witch is shrieking, "I'm melting, I'm melting"...... so they had big red flags months ago but preferred to keep milking Hsu and his "straw donors"..... ooooh, this could be very bad indeed for the witch.

"They knew [about Hsu], and they knew back in June," a source told The News. Cassidy raised a red flag after a friend came to him with a tale of being offered 64% annual returns by Hsu. "It was either predatory lending or a Ponzi scheme," the source said, adding that the FBI had interviewed Cassidy and took as evidence numerous e-mails he sent to political officials about Hsu. Camp Clinton never responded to Cassidy, but dealt with the worried California party members. According to the Los Angeles Times, Clinton's Western finance director, Samantha Wolf, e-mailed, "I can tell you with 100% certainty that Norman Hsu is NOT involved in a Ponzi scheme," adding, "He is COMPLETELY legit."

[vietvet67]

Sole reason for early and large return of monies?

FBI investigation.

[indcons]

She got caught this time. Wonder how many more ChiComs are hiding in Hillary’s closet.

Interestingly, Norman Hsu also bribed Sen. Ubama’s campaign and the DNC.This might turn out to be quite a scandal despite the best efforts of the MSM to squelch news.

[olezip]

WASHINGTON - Hillary Clinton's campaign couldn't explain yesterday why it blew off warnings about felon-turned-fund-raiser Norman Hsu - and the Daily News learned FBI agents are collecting e-mail evidence in the widening scandal.

It is not at all surprising that warnings were ignored. IMO, that risky action can be easily explained by one word. GREED.

[Soliton]

He was buying indulgences (a pardon) in advance. By greasing the palms of Clinton and Obama, he felt like he had a real shot at picking the right pardon horse.

[Williams]

When Hilary gives up money, you know things were so bad that somebody actually had to get up the nerve to tell the witch that it was either this or jail. Hopefully, it’s both.

[Williams]

I’m sure it’s just an innocent mistake, I mean, I’m sure Hsu and the other crooks behind the money don’t want anything, they just like Hilary, blah blah blah ....

[bert]

To whom did she return the money?

As Rush asked......show us the check!!

If the Paw’s get money back, we want to know the source. Was tax paid by the Paws on those funds

[FreePaul]

Clinton was forced Monday to give back a whopping $850,000...

Anyone here willing to take Clinton's word on this? How will we know if anything is given back?

[LRS]

Hillary Clinton's campaign couldn't explain yesterday why it blew off warnings about felon-turned-fund-raiser Norman Hsu...

Uh, try some words like: arrogance; greed; lust; etc...

[The Forgotten Man]

With this track record by the both of them what would happen if they both got back into the WH? Their greed for power seems to now be outweighed by their greed for money. What if some foreign interest, less interested in the US, paid them off while in the WH for some favorable return? These people can not be trusted, period. One only has to look at 1992-2000 to see that....

[Joe Boucher]

Modus operendi?

[savedbygrace]

Clinton should fire the person in charge of finances for her campaign. Anything less is a wink at the bundling crime.

[Eagles Talon IV]

Something is happening here and the lib media is trying as hard as it can to minimize it. If the FBI turns up more stench related to the libs the DBM will have a huge decision to make. They can continue to bury or minimize this scandal (another one) and risk losing what is left of their credibility for a long, long time or they can jump in with both feet and show the country they can be trusted to be fair. This will serve them in the long run and even allow them to continue their bias, albeit in a more modest way. Buy burying this until they are forced to cover it they will sacrifice long term credibility for short term gain.

[Leisler]

"Look, Hill-ah-ee take our monee! We Soooo own her boneee ass!"

[Lee'sGhost]

The headline is misleading. They CAN explain, it’s just that they won’t. They expect this to just evaporate like all the other scandals.

News flash, Klinton @sswipes: The new media is a lot strong these days. It’s not going away.

[Humble Servant]

Banner headline #1:

CLINTON KNEW!!

Banner #2:

THE MSM KNEW!!!