I have yet to come to any (AND I MEAN ANY) energy thread on this forum that proposes a new concept, where the naysayers don’t completely destroy the thread.
EVERY SINGLE ENERGY CONCEPT WE UTILIZE TODAY, HAD NAYSAYERS TELLING EVERYONE IT WOULD NEVER WORK.
99.99% of the time they are right, but you know what, that one time when they’re wrong won’t get persued if they keep it up.
Let these things play out on their own. When it’s over, say, “That’s what I thought.” No big deal.
The claim is that they don’t want to see good money thrown away on a bad idea. But the truth is, any money that is spent on new ideas will get the same damned reaction out them, so what the hell does drive the real complaint anyway?
Do these folks all work for coal, oil and natural gas concerns, or are they just flat earthers afraid to see any new ideas tried. And don’t tell me everything has been tried before.
Hell, every new discovery proves that that idea hadn’t been tried before. But it is new, so naysayers naysay on...
Thanks for the post. As I said, it strikes me as a combination of cynicism and having to prove your the smartest kid in the class. Sort of like Al Gore ;-)
Exciting the water with RF in order to break down the water molecule is a losing game; you will never get more out than you put in. Now if somebody would be able to produce neutrons from this experiment I would say they have something. Until then; show me the flux.