Forgive me, but I don’t understand your point or points.
“Individual “preference” if perceived as doctrine is nothing more than a road leading to anarchy.”
Are you speaking of the young woman’s preference or mine that she should dress more conservatively? Do you think she should be allowed to board the plane in the buff if that’s her preference? If not, you’re setting unreasonable standards, you despicable prude.
“Whining however wasn’t a dictated right placed in the Constitution.”
Are you speaking of the young woman’s complaints or my posts? If it’s the latter, that’s a brilliant way to dismiss a point of view you disagree with rather than actually refuting it. (Do I need to explain the last bit was sarcasm?)
If THAT was her intent, she wouldn't have passed security...
Well, there should be some screening standards, of course. Can't have anarchy!