EGPWS wrote: “They are a swivel capable neck, eyes that are movable in sockets, and eye lid’s for the hard core offense challenged.”
So, everyone else (who has an issue with it) needs to just suck it up while the young woman dresses as she pleases? Yes, the problem is always those nasty prudes who just don’t respect a fine young thing!
Hey, I like the way women look. I even enjoy scantily clad ones. I just don’t think everything is appropriate in public. Had the woman dressed even a bit more conservatively (please note that skirt was likely worn much differently on the plane), it wouldn’t have been an issue. In other words, she created the issue, and her mode of dress shows disrespect for her fellow travelers. You probably don’t agree, but in the public sphere, people should tend to more conservative dress.
Why am I making a bid deal out of this? Because it’s representative of a society that’s teetering out of control. Everyone is so concerned about their “rights” and “freedoms,” and to h*** with everyone else. This is NOT what the founders intended when they spoke of individual liberty.
The "forefathers" preached and wrote a doctrine reflecting the idea that individuals have freedoms not the masses in total.
When individual "freedoms" are infringed upon we are to be protected.
Individual "preference" if perceived as doctrine is nothing more than a road leading to anarchy.
This being the case, you have the right as an individual with God given rights to avoid distaste by others in total if desired.
You also are blessed with the ability to reason via the human factor.
Whining however wasn't a dictated right placed in the Constitution.
That would be a damned good start.