[js1138]

If there is, I'd be the first to desist.

At any rate I quote him when I copy it ( see post #1 for instance ) and DO SAY THAT IT IS HIS WORDS.

Oh really?

You were challenged on the seventh post on that thread, but you never explained why you failed to provide a link or credit to the author. You have been asked many times to explain this, most recently on this very thread.

[SirLinksalot]

You were challenged on the seventh post on that thread, but you never explained why you failed to provide a link or credit to the author. You have been asked many times to explain this, most recently on this very thread.

Simple, I forgot ( I believe I said it before ). And ever since then, I try my best to refer to Dembski or anyone else when I quote them.

Now that my explanation is given, what next ? Are you going to dredge a matter that is over a year old again ? For what purpose ? How does this prove Neo-darwinism is a better explanation to nature than intelligent design ?

My interest is in your arguments. You insist on going personal. Why is that ?