[SirLinksalot]

You were challenged on the seventh post on that thread, but you never explained why you failed to provide a link or credit to the author. You have been asked many times to explain this, most recently on this very thread.

Simple, I forgot ( I believe I said it before ). And ever since then, I try my best to refer to Dembski or anyone else when I quote them.

Now that my explanation is given, what next ? Are you going to dredge a matter that is over a year old again ? For what purpose ? How does this prove Neo-darwinism is a better explanation to nature than intelligent design ?

My interest is in your arguments. You insist on going personal. Why is that ?

[js1138]

Simple, I forgot ( I believe I said it before ).

I suggest that anyone interested in your claim that you "just forgot" click on the link and observe that you were immediately challenged to provide a link and a credit to Dembski. The thread went on for several days, and you never responded.

Let's face it, when you post a thread, you are required to post the author of the article and the the URL of the web page from which you are quoting. You can't "simply forget."

Assuming you can't read well enough to notice that you have filled out false information when posting, it is customary, when others point out your mistake, to post a correction or ask a moderator to make the correction.

So to answer your next question, I will not stop calling attention to this until you provide a plausible explanation or go back to the original thread and post a correction. I've given you the link.