I’ve been reading some affirmative action information and can tell you, legally, anything that has a disparate outcome for different groups (race, sex, ethnicity, orientation, etc) is inherently considered discriminatory.
Since there is a “disparate outcome” for the number of out-of-wedlock births for certain minority groups,
talking about it is racist.
(note: this is a sarcastic analysis of the assinine legal precedents of “discrimination” politics)
You’re missing my point.
Our race is human.
Unless you include other races - dogs, cats, birds, horses, whatever - in your study, the outcome cannot be racist.
Ethnically biased? Bigoted? Discriminatory? Sure. Racist? Scientifically impossible.