Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

The state has made its position clear: Drive home drunk, or risk getting busted for DUI in a non-moving car.


3 posted on 09/02/2007 3:27:58 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan

He had to have driven the car to that location, uh....DRUNK.


4 posted on 09/02/2007 3:29:55 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

With the motor running, the drunk was in fact operating a motor vehicle under the influence. I believe it would have different had the man not cranked the pickup.


21 posted on 09/02/2007 3:58:51 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

Was the man sitting behind the wheel? or in the front passenger seat? I suspect that if he had been sitting in the front passenger seat, he might have won his case.


140 posted on 09/02/2007 8:45:12 AM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

Exactly. If the guy made it home in one piece then nobody would have been the wiser.


151 posted on 09/02/2007 9:15:23 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson