[Thanks, already have it.]
Then try reading it.
There are two statutes containing the word “Lewd”.
One regarding Telephone calls.
One regarding acts directed at a minor.
Which one?
“Then try reading it.”
I have read it. If you claim to have, you should read it again so you can understand it. You haven’t a clue.
What law did Craig break? Touching feet? What law?
You say these?
“One regarding Telephone calls.”
“One regarding acts directed at a minor.”
“Which one?”
Neither. What are you talking about?
Telephone call...nope, Minor? Nope, not that one either.
Let’s be clear about this. Craig used VERY poor judgment when he pled guilty to misconduct. He should have had an attorney advise him.
The fact is there is NO EVIDENCE of a crime committed here. Read the statutes again...didn’t expose himself, didn’t say anything incriminating. Nothing, nada, zip.
I get it that you don’t like this guy. That is beside the point. There was NO CRIME committed. There is no evidence, and the cop didn’t do his job properly in this sting operation. He came up empty. He did scare Craig into thinking he could avoid a trial by pleading to misconduct...again, poor judgment on Craig’s part. The prosecutor had nothing to go on...NOTHING.
Now, if you do have more info, or evidence, show it. Otherwise, you’ll have to admit you’re wrong on this one.