“Then try reading it.”
I have read it. If you claim to have, you should read it again so you can understand it. You haven’t a clue.
What law did Craig break? Touching feet? What law?
You say these?
“One regarding Telephone calls.”
“One regarding acts directed at a minor.”
“Which one?”
Neither. What are you talking about?
Telephone call...nope, Minor? Nope, not that one either.
Let’s be clear about this. Craig used VERY poor judgment when he pled guilty to misconduct. He should have had an attorney advise him.
The fact is there is NO EVIDENCE of a crime committed here. Read the statutes again...didn’t expose himself, didn’t say anything incriminating. Nothing, nada, zip.
I get it that you don’t like this guy. That is beside the point. There was NO CRIME committed. There is no evidence, and the cop didn’t do his job properly in this sting operation. He came up empty. He did scare Craig into thinking he could avoid a trial by pleading to misconduct...again, poor judgment on Craig’s part. The prosecutor had nothing to go on...NOTHING.
Now, if you do have more info, or evidence, show it. Otherwise, you’ll have to admit you’re wrong on this one.
Those are the only two MN Criminal Code statutes that explicitly contain the word Lewd.
The correct statute was charged - The statute for Disorderly Conduct includes conduct that is Obscene.
Obscene behavior. That’s what Craig pleaded guilty to.
That’s what the other perps caught by this sting apparently pleaded guilt to as well and NOT ONE of them has spoken up so far -at least not openly.
[You’ll have to admit you’re wrong]
What time IS Craig resigning today?