Replies

Ron Paul obviously got a bunch of his followers to load-up this poll - Was there a link to it on "Nutjob.com?" Actually, SJackson posted an earlier copy of the same poll when Kucinich was holding the lead by a small margin. SJackson wanted everyone to believe Kucinich actually had more support than Ron Paul. Then, apparently, the Paulian Horde noticed it.

Interesting, GWB from Ron Paul central skipping threads.

No, it was a response to a suggestion I support Dennis.

As I noted, these internet polls are bogus, and those who believe them are morons, yes GWB, you are a political moron.

But let's see your response to this now "legitimate" poll when King Ron was only up 3-1, in post 74

Asterisk-Free Libertarianism--The Constitution For Dummies (i.e. Ron Paul Supporters)

Posted by George W. Bush to SJackson; DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; ...
On News/Activism 08/26/2007 12:32:50 PM CDT · 74 of 152

I thought I should repost SJackson's post and my own response and flag all of you to it.

SJackson,
Post #39
Since we're discussing moonbat candidates, that makes sense. After all, like Paul, Dennis is winning the moonbat vote.

Dennis Kucinich Beating Ron Paul in Online Poll
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?storyid=21531&ret=Default.aspx

Washington D.C. 8/25/2007 9:59 AM GMT (FINDITT)
USAElectionPolls.com is currently holding an online straw poll on the front page of its website. The questions is worded "Who do you want to see as president? (Reps and Dems)".
Dennis Kucinich is leading the Democrats by a 3:1 margin over Barack Obama.
Ron Paul has a commanding 5:1 lead over Mitt Romney.
If it was a head to head bout, Dennis Kucinich would be beating Internet Phenom Ron Paul.
Go to http://www.usaelectionpolls.com.

Notice how SJackson posts a false and misleading result from an obscure website. Although providing a link to the real online poll page, SJackson relies on the laziness of FReepers to fall for her little trick.

Here's the real online poll result:

Who do you want to see as president? (Reps and Dems)

Rudy Giuliani 2% (38)
Fred Thompson 1% (18)
Mitt Romney 3% (68)
John McCain 0% (7)
Newt Gingrich 0% (10)
Mike Huckabee 1% (30)
Ron Paul 52% (1152)
Tom Tancredo 0% (3)
Sam Brownback 0% (3)
Duncan Hunter 0% (4)
Barack Obama 9% (203)
John Edwards 2% (40)
Hillary Clinton 4% (90)
Bill Richardson 1% (18)
Dennis Kucinich 20% (448)
Joe Biden 1% (15)
Mike Gravel 1% (17)
Chris Dodd 0% (5)
Al Gore 2% (40)

I thought it was worth pointing out how SJackson and the other Paul-haters routinely use misleading quotes from obscure websites to trash Ron Paul. It shows how desperate and dishonest they really are. Well, if the malicious keyword spamming they engage in isn't enough to tip readers off to begin with.

As usual, when her trick is exposed (as she has been so many times before), SJackson will feign indignant righteousness, pretending that she didn't know and click through. Of course, when someone like SJackson has done this exact same trick dozens of times on countless threads with her little crew of Paul-haters, the denials become pretty hard to believe. Any ordinary person who examines such a post would conclude that SJackson is a deliberate smearer who has no interest in the truth.

It doesn't get much more dishonest than this. But I'm sure the Paul-haters are just waiting for another chance to smear Ron Paul as they have done so many times before. This is part and parcel of the tactics of the Paul-haters, hence my flag to the rest of you.

George W. Bush's characterization of me and those who have the audacity not to support Paul as follows in post .

blatantly dishonest article from you.
your entire little ongoing trollfest
How ignorant and malicious can you be?
Your posts are systematic in their use of innuendo and third-party misquotes
Your own news threads are all suspect when you have established such a history of deliberate dishonesty.
As usual, when her trick is exposed (as she has been so many times before), SJackson will feign indignant righteousness, pretending that she didn't know and click through
her little crew of Paul-haters
It doesn't get much more dishonest than this
This is part and parcel of the tactics of the Paul-haters, hence my flag to the rest of you.
They attempt to get someone to say someone about 9/11 Trutherism or something antisemitic so they all hit Abuse.
This is an organized disinformation effort by the Paul-haters, likely coordinated via FRmail if you notice the pattern of how they appear on these threads.
I thought that due to the repeated dishonest posting and baiting tactics the Paul-haters use, we need to start pointing it out.
see exactly how the Paul-haters operate, who they are, who some of them truly support, the anti-FReeper forums some of them belong to, etc.
Many of the Paul-haters are not what they appear to be. They are FUDsters and rely on people's laziness to believe their lies and distortions. I think everyone needs to know about it before they waste their time responding to such obvious trollish and baiting posts.

The fact of the matter is that George W. Bush is full of *rap. He pontificates, but can't back up anything. A characteristic many of his fellow Paul supporters share. They do their candidate no favors.

Anyway, he's got 2,000 plus votes out ther George, can't do much better than that.

And any time you care to attempt to back up those accusations, feel free to ping me.

If you care to ping me thread to thread like this, that's ok too, you're not a particularly competant troll.

BTW, what's with the she stuff.

The only time I've been called a she was a few years ago on either libertypost or libertyforum, a thread about the conspiracy at FR. Did you make that up, or in your extensive reasearch on google about me and other Freepers (you did admit that GWB) did you read something a banned freeper posted and take it for fact?

Or do you think as a female my opinion is less important?

My original point stands, despite your denials.

You took a post on an obscure forum that claimed Kucinich was the winner. In fact, Paul was already leading at the actual online poll.

And why didn't you just post the poll results directly? Obviously, that didn't suit your purpose.

It's not the first time you've used these same sorts of tactics.

The only time I’ve been called a she was a few years ago on either libertypost or libertyforum, a thread about the conspiracy at FR.

(chuckle)

You oughta get a load of what they call me in those two kook forums these days.....