Skip to comments.
Ron Paul supporters urged to attend MoveOn.org Rally !
RonPaul MeetUp Group ^
| 26 August 2007
| David Osborne
Posted on 08/26/2007 10:44:41 AM PDT by davidosborne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500, 501-520, 521-540 ... 1,261-1,263 next last
To: janetgreen
Well never know as long as the neocons are in charge, will we? All I can say is YIKES!
I view Iran as the base territory of the current Jihad. 1979 made that clear. I believe to militarily engage Iran would require full mobilization of this nation. On the other hand with our fine volunteer army we have been able to surround Iran.
That our troops are in Iraq and Afghanistan surrounding Iran I sure hope they can establish a base friendly to our army and our nation.
I'm don't see "neocon" bogeymen around every corner.
I see an enemy who wants to kill us and calls us Satan and we can either fully mobilize and strike directly with all our resources at our enemy's homeland or we can try a strategy that doesn't require full mobilization but instead surrounds our enemy by establishing friendly bases on our enemies borders leading to the eventual defeat of the Jihad.
To: dixiechick2000; txflake; davidosborne; janetgreen
You jumped on the bandwagon on comments made attacking janetgreen and that her comments should be found on KOS and DU.
Quit trying to get out of, by changing the subject, of what you PLAINLY added to the dumping on of janetgreen’s opinions. I could care less what you posted two years ago.
I know what janetgreen’s been posting for longer than two years....and it would NEVER be found on KOS or DU.
To: nicmarlo
Always the sweetheart there Nicky...
We shall see...
503
posted on
08/26/2007 10:07:28 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: janetgreen
"Duncan Hunter, Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo."
Two who will fight the WOT and stay in Iraq and finish the job, Huner and Tancredo. One that is already signaling his desire to surrender to Al Qaeda by taking of his white adult depends and waving them, Paul.
504
posted on
08/26/2007 10:08:36 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: L98Fiero
And lastly, if you think there is a man alive capable of shrinking modern Western government without completely breaking it and starting over, you have no business discussing politics with adults. That shrinking government is an idealistic pipe-dream of the highest order. I guess next we will have world-peace and social justice. Just as realistic.
Shrinking government is easier said then done. However, it makes more than one man. It's going to take 535 bureaucrats in DC to grow some god damn balls in order to get it done. Naturally, most of the bureaucrats love big government... so any drastic cuts within the next 20 yrs will probably never happen.
I Agree with you. Is downsizing DC a good idea? Hell yeah! Will it ever happen? Hell no.
505
posted on
08/26/2007 10:09:21 PM PDT
by
BigTom85
(Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
To: BigTom85
The subject of the thread is not just one man’s post on a meetup — but rather the whole IDEA of Ron Paul folks seeking recruits and a MoveOn event — I just asked the question if the Ron Paul folks on FR thought this was good idea, and aparently the answer was NO at first, and after further consideration YES... so here we are 500 posts later.. LOL
506
posted on
08/26/2007 10:11:13 PM PDT
by
davidosborne
(http://DuncanHunter.meetup.com/1 - GrassRoots Organization(s-) to elect Duncan Hunter)
To: karsten5
Was it just me then, because he sounded like a loon during the Republican debate?
I mean, I honestly wasn’t looking to turn on the tube to find a loony candidate, but it seems to be what I saw.
507
posted on
08/26/2007 10:12:11 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: nicmarlo
You must be kidding, saying we went to war for oil is all over the liberal sites.
508
posted on
08/26/2007 10:12:24 PM PDT
by
1035rep
To: janetgreen
Ron Paul was getting trashed, and I don't think he deserves that in a conservative forum from supposedly conservative posters. Janet, Dr. Paul is trashed because there are folks out there who don't want to be weaned off the teat of the federal government. Once Paul's elected, their sacred cows are going to be slaughtered, and I for one will fire up the grill and chow down alongside him.
I honestly think Paul will go deep in the primaries and have an impact on whoever's going to be the GOP nominee. Dr. Paul is returning the Republican Party back to its roots, just like Coolidge did in 1922, Goldwater in 1964, and Reagan did in 1980.
These folks can bash Paul all they want, but the truth is that Paul has the GOP by the groin. He can easily entertain a 3rd party candidacy and throw the election to Hillary. Or the GOP will have to be forced to adopt some of his ideas so they won't lose Paul's supporters. I think Dr. Paul is going to have the last laugh here to the chagrin of the party hacks angry that a coalition of Americans are supporting Paul instead of the MSM hand-picked choice.
To: italianquaker
If this buffoon didnt blame America for 9-11, would support the troops and be honest about his earmark positions(shrimp)he still would lose but he wouldnt be such a joke.
Ohh wow! Three hannity bush-bot talking points in one sentence! Quaker, I always enjoy reading your posts.. your bush-botness amazes me more and more every time. Turn off Rush and Sean and start thinking for yourself.
510
posted on
08/26/2007 10:14:20 PM PDT
by
BigTom85
(Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
To: nicmarlo
What the hell?
DO you just blindly flail way or are you really such a “devote” that you missed my little demonstration.
I quoted her, blood for oil, just as said by JG, in direct opposition to your “not on DU/KOS” meme
The intention may not be the same but the words damn sure are.
511
posted on
08/26/2007 10:14:41 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: BigTom85
Shrinking governmnet necesarily involves a non-inteventionist foreign policy. Our current foreign policy is so expensive, that we need the IRS. However, the huge unconstitutional tax system that we currently have is not even enough to pay for it, so we borrow the money — but even that is not enough to pay for it. So, we print money to finance the wars. This unconstitutional federal reserve system of printing money out of thin air causes massive inflation. There is a strong link between foreign policy and economic policy, and that is why I believe Ron Paul is the only real small governmnet conservative in this race.
512
posted on
08/26/2007 10:15:16 PM PDT
by
karsten5
(www.ronpaul2008.com -- Join the Ron Paul Revolution)
To: 1035rep
You must be kidding, saying we went to war for oil is all over the liberal sites. I will then, repeat MY questions:
Bush is supporting Islam by keeping open borders.Why send out troops to be hurt abroad when innocent Americans are being taken out at home, by illegals and by terrorists coming through the borders?
What kind of war on terror is that?
Let me know when you can find a logical answer.
To: ejonesie22
see my post #513 (a repost I made earlier). Get back to me when you have something logical to say.
To: nicmarlo
I did post in this thread that it's a full moon and people sometimes get hotter than they normally might.
You calling me a bot, you letch, is over the line. I try to support the President wherever I can, but I am not a BOT.
515
posted on
08/26/2007 10:16:44 PM PDT
by
txhurl
(And I have resisted every single Rudy, RP thread for a year!)
To: janetgreen
So you don’t consider Fred Thompson a real conservative?
516
posted on
08/26/2007 10:17:11 PM PDT
by
End Times Crusader
(Ron Paul - candidate of choice of David Duke (and drug addicts))
To: ejonesie22
Thats me, sucking the joy out of politics...
I'm not sure if you merit full joy-sucker status just yet. But I'm monitoring... LOL.
517
posted on
08/26/2007 10:18:09 PM PDT
by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
To: karsten5
Paul doesn’t mind big government when wild shrimp is involved.
518
posted on
08/26/2007 10:19:28 PM PDT
by
End Times Crusader
(Ron Paul - candidate of choice of David Duke (and drug addicts))
To: karsten5
I agree with what you said to me 100%. What I said in my post that cutting governemnt will never happen under the mentality in DC now. Except for a select few (Paul being one), most politicians in DC are to drunk on power and spenidng money like crazy.
I agree, Ron Paul has some grea ideas. I agree with him on about 80% of the issues. It's a shame that a so called 'conservative' forum has such hostility towards one of the few real conservatives on the ballot.
519
posted on
08/26/2007 10:20:26 PM PDT
by
BigTom85
(Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
To: txflake
So you say.
And janetgreen is no DUmmie, just because she doesn’t agree with whatever it is you believe.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500, 501-520, 521-540 ... 1,261-1,263 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson