I’m amazed at these complete blundering idiots. Are they really as stupid as they sound?
What about killing fish with dogs? I knew a guy once who clubbed a poodle to death with a salmon.
Who is Lawrence O’Donnell?
So there’s nothing wrong with letting Vick and McDonell fight it out gladiator style until only one is left, right? There are truly some sicko freaks in this world.
Sick bastards!
if thats what this FPOS thinks, then maybe he should be made to watch several hours of it till he gets his mind right... 
I say give that puke O’Donnell a choice between climbing into a cage of hungry wild dogs, or dive into a pool of hungry wild piranha.
And of course a case of Pepto to the losers who end up devouring O’Donnell.
On the other hand, nix that - feeding O’Donnell to any life form would constitute something cruel and unusual, Hell even Hannibal Lecter would turn down that putrid a meal.
Another problem with Larry’s defense of Vick: Dog fighting is illegal...fishing isn’t.
It never ceases to amaze. Pick any sick demented behavior and some imbecile will be along to defend it.
I’ll never forget seeing O’Donnell and John O’Neill on Hardball before the ‘04 election.
Creeeepy liar alert
Lawrence O’Donnell, the guy who had an emotional melt-down while he was half drunk on TV defending John Kerry. Oh yeah, I have a lot of regard for what this wacko has to say.
That's because you're a moron, Larry boy. Here's your sign.
The only thing that I’ve always wondered, is why anyone listens to anything that this horse’s ass has to say?
First of all, let me say that I find dog fight repulsive and barbaric and the descriptions of what happened to the poor animals who failed their “fighting tests”, how cruelly they were dispatched, beyond words and it’s incomprehensible to me how some people can be so vicious.
I’m no expert on this so-called “sport”, but there was a time however when dog fighting, bull baiting, cock fighting, etc. were acceptable forms of entertainment. Think back to ancient Rome when animals and even humans fought to the death for the entertainment of the crowd. We today we see it differently and of course know these things are wrong in context of how we today view our world and apply our moral standards.
The problem here today is that the animal rights wackies want us to anthropomorphize all animals to such an extent that hunting, fishing, raising animals for food and even keeping animals as pets is viewed as equally barbaric as dog fighting and gladiatorial combat, when in reality they aren’t. Then again the folks at PETA probably don’t give the proverbial fat rat’s a$$ about humans and wouldn’t care if we brought back gladiators as long as no “animals” were involved.
I used to go fishing with my dad. We threw many back and were happy to see them swim safely away. And the fish we kept (for mom to cook up for dinner), we didn’t mutilate or torture for our entertainment. I’ve never had an interest in hunting but I’ve known many hunters over the years (and received gifts of some great deer meat) and I know they strive to kill the animal with one shot as quickly and humanly as possible. I’ve known hunters who were very upset when they wounded a deer and it ran off and could not be found, and not just because they lost their quarry but because they really didn’t want the animal to suffer. The same goes for farmers, they usually care about their animals and when it comes time for slaughter, they dispatch them as quickly and painlessly as possible and they don’t take any glee in seeing them suffer.
Obviously Lawrence O’Donnell is too intellectually challenged to discern the difference.
So, apparently Mr. O’Donnell is against killing dogs, fish, cows and any living animal. I wonder what his position is on abortion???