Posted on 08/25/2007 4:31:39 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
“Lawrence O’Donnell Compares Killing Dogs With Catching Fish”
What a big city, liberal, know-nothing dumbsh*t.
Yes. Thank you.
Historically, he has sought out man, not vice versa. He lived on the outskirts of the villages, consuming the byproducts of man’s existence. In return, he warned them of intrusion and danger. Soon they began fighting alongside man, helping him hunt, protecting him in the wild, and in some cases looking over man’s infant offspring.
Interesting. I had assumed a much higher level of force involved. Thank you for that information.
He must be truly stupid to utter this absurdity in public.
What a PC idiot. You can eat fish and you can’t eat dogs except in Korea.
Pray for W and Our Troops
The only people I know personally who eat lamb chops are farmers and butchers from way back.
As for the others, I think you might be surprised at the vast numbers of people who don't think very deeply about anything at all. While there is plenty of denial going on, there is another group who are simply satisfied that food comes from supermarkets and it doesn't occur to them to wonder how that came to be.
“Interesting. I had assumed a much higher level of force involved. Thank you for that information.”
It’s my pleasure. As you could probably tell, I have no aversion to talking about dogs. :) Have a great weekend!
LOL! Perfect example of the cluelessness I mentioned in my post above.
Man is unique in that he is animal but not fully so. Some combination of intellect/soul combines to make us aware of our actions and the suffering of other animals.
Some people would like to deny that we are at the top of the food chain with as much natural right as a lion to kill and consume other animals.
That intellect/divine spark compells us to do so with as little suffering to others as manageable.
I can live with that.
So you’re of the belief that humans are animals? Who gave us the name of ‘humans’ or ‘animals’ but us? We have designated ourselves as ‘humans’, but you have designated us as ‘animals’. And I think you mean it literally. Why would you have us all be animals? Have you forgotten that we have our own designation: it’s called ‘human’. Do you not know the difference between humans and animals? That is why we have different names. A human is a human, and an animal is an animal. I don’t know how I could make it any more simple. And I don’t see how you could mix up the two. (Except in the case of... but we won’t go there.)
Fish Fighting will now be exposed from the under-belly of America. Thanks to the remarkable observations of Mr. O’Donnell
. any member of the kingdom Animalia, comprising multicellular organisms that have a well-defined shape and usually limited growth, can move voluntarily, actively acquire food and digest it internally, and have sensory and nervous systems that allow them to respond rapidly to stimuli: some classification schemes also include protozoa and certain other single-celled eukaryotes that have motility and animallike nutritional modes. 2. any such living thing other than a human being. 3. a mammal, as opposed to a fish, bird, etc. 4. the physical, sensual, or carnal nature of human beings; animality: the animal in every person. 5. an inhuman person; brutish or beastlike person: She married an animal. 6. thing: A perfect job? Is there any such animal? –adjective 7. of, pertaining to, or derived from animals: animal instincts; animal fats. 8. pertaining to the physical, sensual, or carnal nature of humans, rather than their spiritual or intellectual nature: animal needs.
Yeah, I guess you’re right. But, he’s still a drunk.
= 
Send those pictures to O’Dumbell
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.