Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dcwusmc
Here in the nanny-state, the tax payer is often expected to bail out the consequences of reckless behavior in their neighbor.

Consider a typical single welfare mother raising multiple children via multiple fathers. Is the behavior that produced the children still a completely "private" matter?

391 posted on 08/22/2007 6:05:49 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: AndyTheBear

The behavior is a private matter, AS ARE THE CONSEQUENCES. The taxpayer has no business being tapped to pay for someone else’s problems, ever, period. It is totally and completely the responsibility of the mother and the father(s) to support those kids. The guys had the fun of MAKING the babies, not me. Why in the name of Milton Friedman should I be the one paying the bills?


395 posted on 08/22/2007 6:54:14 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

To: AndyTheBear
"Here in the nanny-state, the tax payer is often expected to bail out the consequences of reckless behavior in their neighbor.
Consider a typical single welfare mother raising multiple children via multiple fathers. Is the behavior that produced the children still a completely "private" matter?"

Yes the behavior is still a private matter ...

and the answer/solution of course should be quite obvious...

instead of trying to legislate the personal behavior ...

ELIMINATE THE NANNY STATE!!

401 posted on 08/22/2007 9:51:51 PM PDT by SubGeniusX ($29.95 Guarantees Your Salvation!!! Or TRIPLE Your Money Back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson