Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy
That would be a "No.".

We'll now return to our regularly scheduled program of alternately ridiculing the libertarians for being able to convene in a phone booth, and blaming those 3 votes every time you lose an election.

245 posted on 08/21/2007 8:33:43 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

I blame them more for trying to get others to also throw their votes down the black hole than I do for just their own voting.


247 posted on 08/21/2007 8:36:19 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

We’ll now return to our regularly scheduled program of alternately ridiculing the libertarians for being able to convene in a phone booth, and blaming those 3 votes every time you lose an election.
__________________________________________________

LOL. I still think that Libertarians could make the difference in quite a few primary races and elections AND that Libertarians stand no chance of winning office without being part of a party that is a coalition with others. To the extent that the party is becoming primarily focused on drugs and sex, then maybe that is a good thing from the conservative perspective.


277 posted on 08/22/2007 6:34:22 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is the conservative in the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson