Hanson cites Bible urination as reason to stop [Muslim] immigration

ninemsn ^ | August, 2007

[Posting]

Hanson cites Bible urination as reason to stop immigration Thursday Aug 16 10:00 AEST By Hal Crawford ninemsn http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=286783

A resurgent Pauline Hanson has called for an end to Muslim immigration to Australia in a fiery television appearance peppered with references to female genital mutilation, terrorism and urinating on Bibles.

Ms Hanson, the 53-year-old former One Nation leader, appeared on Nine's TODAY to promote her new Pauline's United Australia Party.

[ClearCase_guy]

I think the headline makes her sound a bit stupid. But the article makes her sound right on. The world needs more people like her.

[GraniteStateConservative]

The US should ban the genital mutilation of infants, boys and girls. So should other civilized places like Australia and England. Make stupid religious practices illegal to keep stupid religious people out of your country, if you have a problem with stupid religious people.

[driftdiver]

“The US should ban the genital mutilation of infants, boys and girls. So should other civilized places like Australia and England. Make stupid religious practices illegal to keep stupid religious people out of your country, if you have a problem with stupid religious people.”

Or we could BAN stupid people like you that spread their hateful rhetoric.

Circumcision has been done for thousands of years and has been proven to lower the risk of spreading diseases such as aids.

Female circumcision is done for a different reason. It is done to control the female.

[Ragnar54]

Beheading people is already illegal, but that hasn’t slowed Muslim immigration into the US.

[PBRSTREETGANG]

If you’re a nation, this Muslim urination is a sign of impending ruination.

[GraniteStateConservative]

In fact, it should be illegal to perform circumcision on any minor, not just infants.

[Albion Wilde]

Your post seeks to make moral equivalence between Christianity and Islam because they are both “religions”. Don’t be stupid, mate. There’s no comparison between a religion in which God sacrificed His Son for us to give us life, and the religion in which everyone is expected to sacrifice their sons for Allah to bring death to the infidel.

[samson1097]

Your ignorance impresses me.

[longtermmemmory]

Editors intentionally manipulate headlines to manipulate search engines and lexis/nexis.

[bassmaner]

So should other civilized places like Australia and England.

The English did this once, in the days of the raj in India. They banned the practice of suttee: ie. the burning alive of widows of men that had died. Mark Steyn wrote about it in his book 'America Alone': the British commander that ordered the ban stated that 'if you build the pyre to kill the widow in accordance with your traditions, we'll follow our traditions and build a gallows to hang you right next to it.'

We can only hope that the West can muster up the courage that it once had to stand up to evil, regardless of its 'religious' or 'cultural' cloak.

[GraniteStateConservative]

Circumcision has been done for thousands of years and has been proven to lower the risk of spreading diseases such as aids.

Female circumcision is done for a different reason. It is done to control the female.

If you believe such reports about HIV infection and circumcision, you must believe this one, too...

A lowered risk of HIV infection among circumcised women...

On the other hand, there are reports that say those conclusions aren't supported.

The Mishra study concluded that circumcision may actually increase transmission of the AIDS virus, however, which is what many earlier studies found. The Brewer Study published in March, 2007, also concluded that circumcision in Kenya, Lesotho, and Tanzania increases the transmission of AIDS.

Circumcision is a barbaric practice with no actual value. It's as stupid as African tribe women who have plates in their lips.

[GraniteStateConservative]

Muslims don’t chop off heads as a standard part of their religious practice.

[driftdiver]

“If you believe such reports about HIV infection and circumcision, you must believe this one, too.”

Stop projecting your hateful opinions on me please.

“Circumcision is a barbaric practice with no actual value. It’s as stupid as African tribe women who have plates in their lips.?”

So everyone is stupid except you? Or is it only religious people that are stupid? That says a lot about you thats not very complimentary.

[GraniteStateConservative]

Your post seeks to make moral equivalence between Christianity and Islam because they are both “religions”. Don’t be stupid, mate. There’s no comparison between a religion in which God sacrificed His Son for us to give us life, and the religion in which everyone is expected to sacrifice their sons for Allah to bring death to the infidel.

Christianity has a very bloodthirsty history, too. How many American Muslims do you know and how many are preparing to bring death to the infidel?

How many infidels has Kareem Abdul-Jabbar killed?

Civilized religious practice is fine with me, but things like genital mutilation of minors isn't. It's actually surreal that it's legal. If countries want to keep religious nuts who have crazy practices out, then ban those practices.

[driftdiver]

“Muslims don’t chop off heads as a standard part of their religious practice”

Uh yes they do. They also chop of hands.

[GraniteStateConservative]

Exactly.

[driftdiver]

“Christianity has a very bloodthirsty history, too. How many American Muslims do you know and how many are preparing to bring death to the infidel?”

Humanity has a very bloodthirsty history. Your hatred of Christians is blinding you.

“Civilized religious practice is fine with me”

Well gee thank you for your permission. Guess we didn’t need the Constitution after all.

[GraniteStateConservative]

Stop projecting your hateful opinions on me please.

Hey, you're the advocate of genital mutilation of infants, not me! I love everybody, even infants.

So everyone is stupid except you? Or is it only religious people that are stupid? That says a lot about you thats not very complimentary.

No, people who engage in barbarism in the name of religion are stupid, though. Religious people who don't engage in barbarism are fine by me.

[GraniteStateConservative]

When’s the last time a Muslim chopped off a head here?