Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Two Things To Know Before Your City is Nuked By Terrorists
Townhall.com ^ | August 15, 2007 | Douglas MacKinnon

Posted on 08/15/2007 4:41:43 AM PDT by Kaslin

1.) Tragically, horrifyingly, but quite predictably, it’s going to happen. The only question being which American city or cities?

In a recent conversation with a former high level intelligence operative of our government, I raised the possibility of terrorists successfully detonating a nuclear weapon within the United States. His response was sobering in its hopelessness.

First, he stressed how grateful he was that he did not work in Washington, DC, and that his family lived far enough out to survive the coming nuclear blast. When I pressed him as to why he was so sure that Islamic terrorists – with or without the help of Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez – would eventually hit DC or another American city with a nuclear weapon, his anger boiled out.

He pointed the finger squarely at our politicians and our politically correct, left-leaning media, who, in his opinion, have “sealed our fate.” He spoke of politicians from both sides of the aisle who consider border security nothing more than a cheap tool to be used for their reelection and enrichment. He despaired about a media that not only gleefully leaks our nation’s most trusted secrets for partisan gain, but then willingly acts as a propaganda tool for the very terrorists intent on our total destruction.

He warned of the hundreds of “loose nukes” floating around our planet. He patiently explained that the former Soviet Union (no matter what they or our government claim), can’t account for a number of their nuclear warheads. That North Korea may well have a few they are willing to sell to terrorists to prop up their totalitarian regime. That Pakistan – already a nuclear power – may soon fall victim to the Islamic extremists trying to overthrow that government. Of an Iran further ahead in their development of nuclear weapons than thought. And last, but not least, he spoke of the thousands of cruise missiles unaccounted for around the world. A number of those missiles being nuclear tipped.

In short, because of what he portrayed as a “betrayal by those sworn to protect us,” a nuclear attack within our nation, in his mind, is “inevitable.”

2.) When said attack comes, you and your family are on your own. Period. My friend stressed that “our government won’t be there to help us. It is broken beyond repair and incapable of assisting those most affected by the blast.”

He talked of critical infrastructures like water, electricity, fuel, banks, our food supply, medical services, police and firefighters, being unavailable for weeks or months. He warned of the blind panic that would follow such an explosion. Of the looting, of neighbor turning on neighbor to take what they don’t have for their own survival. Of our economy suffering an economic loss in the trillions of dollars.

Knowing this, are you prepared? Can you and your family ride out the frighteningly unpredictable weeks or months following the loss of an American city and its inhabitants? If you are not in the city hit, can you survive?

You must ask yourself this question. For, unless there is a miraculous epiphany about to be visited upon our self-centered politicians, then such an attack is certain.

If our politicians and the voters continue to suicidally put party and partisan politics before the welfare and security of our nation, then the terrorists will find the opening to hit us.

Our government and media are failing us. Prepare for the worst.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 111; 181; asshat; civilwarii; democrats; doomed; doomedisay; dooomed; dooooommeed; enemedia; impetrified; jihadinamerica; liberals; msm; nuke; oohsoscary; prep; preparedness; proliferation; terrorism; wot; y2k
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-254 next last
To: chrisser

lol that’s cool, I’ve caught myself doing the same thing. AFter 911, I was hearing sonic booms over the Gulf of Mexico, and stupidly reported it. That didnt’ last long...


41 posted on 08/15/2007 5:18:51 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

You should chisle that in stone, so you can choke on it when the time comes.
The title you assigned the author belongs to you!


42 posted on 08/15/2007 5:19:08 AM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

Urban Renewal driven by Jihad, but indirectly by the Feds. Lower initial costs than the War on Poverty days.


43 posted on 08/15/2007 5:20:03 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
With the amount of active and retired Army on my block it would be a little hot for looters turning the corner looking for easy pickings.

Most are Korean War and VN vets. I don’t think a gang of looters is going to strike much fear in this bunch.

Of course the younger active guys from the recent fight would have to brush the older guys up on modern house to house fighting. Old farts might be slow but their aim is still good. :-)

44 posted on 08/15/2007 5:20:04 AM PDT by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
"Rescuers were all over Hiroshima and Nagasaki in hours, not days" I'm not so sure the US would respond the same. After all we are now "diverse". We aren't getting our fair share of illegals from Japan and we aren't on a war time footing. Katrina was no picnic for those not willing to help themselves... and the piece de resistance - would you rush to help the pols in D.C.?
45 posted on 08/15/2007 5:20:16 AM PDT by Mumbles (Because we disagree doesn't make you or me right. Treat each other with respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Party_Animal
No government services for months? Baloney

In the aftermath of a disaster some inner cities deteriorate into anarchy and government services are scarce or unavailable. Remember New Orleans and the Superdome. Multiply that by the number of cities hit.

46 posted on 08/15/2007 5:20:34 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bella1
I had a close relative that worked on Capitol Hill until recently and he said the same thing. He believes this will happen so much, that he moved his family from the DC area to a small Midwestern town.

I have a number of relatives and close friends living and working in DC and its first-ring suburbs.

They don't share your relative's cowardice in the face of terrorist threats, and at least two of them have considerably more insight into the risks involved.

As for me, I will continue to work in midtown NYC every day and raise my kids 17 miles away from downtown NYC.

47 posted on 08/15/2007 5:21:43 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bella1

I hear things too, from people who would know. Without giving details, I will say that this is not easily dismissed as fear mongering.


48 posted on 08/15/2007 5:23:51 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Sworn to oppose control freaks, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
Anyone who is counting on Gummint to save us from any catastrophic event - from attack to natural disaster to economic collapse - is living in a dreamland.....

And they also should not count on Social (in)Security, air traffic control, publik skools, and virtually any other thing that gubmint touches......the fastest way to expensive failure is to let the gubmint be in charge.....

49 posted on 08/15/2007 5:24:33 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Made in China: Treat those three words like a warning label)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It seems the “high-level government operative” doesn’t mention turning mecca to glass?


50 posted on 08/15/2007 5:25:59 AM PDT by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

you can believe what you want. But what I know for fact is that the person I am referring to has far more knowledge than you or I or the general public will ever have, and is no way a coward having spent 25+ years in the military. Enough said at this end.


51 posted on 08/15/2007 5:26:56 AM PDT by bella1 (Former Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Why wouldn't we do better than the war-scarred Japanese?

Fear and panic would do far more damage than any nuke the Islamo-facists could whip up. What we would see is skyrocketing gas prices, quickly followed by everything associated with gasoline, i.e., food, clothing, raw materials, etc.

52 posted on 08/15/2007 5:27:11 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Made in China: Treat those three words like a warning label)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
The one place I’d be in an attack, is DC.

Probably right. Why would the terrorists attack pelosi and Reid - their best friends?

53 posted on 08/15/2007 5:29:00 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Anyone see “The Masters of Sci-Fi” last week........the ALIENS will prevent it from happening.
54 posted on 08/15/2007 5:31:08 AM PDT by wolfcreek (2 bad Tyranny, Treachery and Treason never take a vacation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

” skyrocketing gas prices, quickly followed by everything associated with gasoline, i.e., food, clothing, raw materials, etc. “

Already happening — just in slo-mo, for now.. (I refer you to Walmart and Home Depot’s warnings yesterday).

We’re balanced on a pinpoint.


55 posted on 08/15/2007 5:33:49 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (We has met the enemy, and he is us........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Simply a remix of every generality that goes bump in the night. The distinct lack of specifics is the key to knowing that this piece was not the writer’s most informed effort. That and the split effing infinitives.


56 posted on 08/15/2007 5:34:24 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

I wonder if getting a nuke up to the top of a skyscraper

Small aircraft maybe?


57 posted on 08/15/2007 5:35:47 AM PDT by forest6147
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bella1

I have taken it for granted, more and more in the years since 9/11 that this scenario or something similar is inevitable. Most of those living today in the obvious target cities, NY, DC, Chicago, LA, the SF area obviously do not believe this. I expect that they will have no surviving dependents.


58 posted on 08/15/2007 5:35:48 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (A person who does not want the best for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic
The media and government never told the people all that went on after Andrew.

There was not an appreciable rise in murders or rapes or assaults after Andrew.

There was, and my great aunt can confirm, a great deal of theft and a general breakdown in law and order as far as property was concerned.

A dirty bomb detonation would cover a much smaller area than the vast swaths of land that Andrew devastated. If it were to occur in NYC, there would 30,000 NYC police on the scene reporting to one man as opposed to the much smaller and decentralized forces in Dade County.

The combination of much larger police resources and a much smaller area of devastation would simply not be the same as an Andrew or Katrina situation. Moreover, the Feds would be able to go in immediately, since they would be dealing with an act of war and not a natural disaster.

I also doubt that many people would be interested in running toward a nuclear blast site in order to loot.

There is no real comparison between the two scenarios.

Citizens should always be prepared in case of an emergency - but that's not what this guy is saying.

He is saying: give up, it's hopeless, millions will die and there is nothing we can do.

There is plenty we can do: we can be prepared and alert, we can give the Feds the tools they need to track down terrorist scum and dismantle their networks.

59 posted on 08/15/2007 5:35:55 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
I have kids up there. They are safer there than where I live which is next door to the biggest naval base in the world.

I live in the DC metro area. The terrorists target symbols not military targets per se. Just as they came back to take down the WTC, they will try again to take out the Capitol and the WH. In terms of terrorist targets, you are safer than your children.

60 posted on 08/15/2007 5:36:14 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson