[JohnnyZ]

Oh, the Globe is out for revenge on Romney, for sure. It would make them look like fools if he could hoodwink the voters of Massachusetts into springboarding him to higher office, and pull a two-fer by winning the NH primary in the Globe's back yard with completely different positions. There's so much devastating material where Mitt shifts positions, evades questions, etc, much of which the public hasn't heard, and it would be a journalistic disgrace if the Globe couldn't manage to communicate that to their readers.

The thing is, they're the ones with the most information on him, and they're the ones who spend the most time on him.

//

Quotes are quotes, and the ones in the article are factual.

Romney's statement:

"Probably from a political standpoint and a personal standpoint, the greatest mistake was when I first ran for office, being deeply opposed to abortion but saying, 'I support the current law,' which was pro-choice and effectively a pro-choice position."

is demonstratively false.

[Badeye]

From what I can tell, those raising hell about a Romney nomination are doing so based on one issue, abortion.

No problem. I think its counterproductive and totally irrelevant for one simple reason. The President can’t change it, the Congress won’t change it, and the American people seem to believe it should be available by a significant margin (significant compared to the past few presidential election cycle margins of victory).

I do appreciate you expressing your view on this without resorting to attacking the guy’s church. Thats refreshing from what I’ve seen the past couple of months here in the forum.