I didn’t mean that you have no strong convictions. You said you were undecided. I was just telling you what kind of person might like to choose him. Sorry I wasn’t clearer.
I didn’t mean that you have no strong convictions. You said you were undecided. I was just telling you what kind of person might like to choose him. Sorry I wasn’t clearer.
I look for the best person for the job of President. To date, I’ve never in my life (I’m 49 end of this month) found a Democrat thats met my personal standard.
I use four criteria in my ‘decision matrix’ if you want to call it that. IN no particular order: National Defense, taxation, judicial nominations, and 2nd Amendment.
The only thing I know for sure at this point is I won’t be supporting the Democrat nominee under any circumstances
Likewise, I can’t vote for Guiliani, McCain, Paul, or Tancredo. The first three I simply don’t trust, the last one is a bull in a china shop.
Like most, I’ve got concerns about Romney, but abortion isn’t the reason. I can’t help but wonder what he will ‘believe’ a year after being elected. I suspect thats where a lot of voters are with him, with some legitimate reasons.
Conversely, I don’t take anyone seriously thats posting about the man’s religion. Its irrelevant to me, and its supposed to be irrelevant to EVERYONE. This country was built in large part because of religious persecution, and was founded on the notion that ‘freedom of religion’ was important. I think its very important myself.
That said, I don’t care if you wear a coffee filter for headgear on Saturdays (jewish) or go to confess on Saturday’s (catholics). Or if you want to handle snakes while praising Jesus on Tuesday nights. None of my business, as long as you don’t force it upon me.
I don’t know who I’ll vote for, in summation. What I do know is I don’t take the Boston Globe seriously on ANY TOPIC, because of their known political stance, and its problems with plagerism and flat out lying by its current and former reporters and columnists.
Hoe this clears things up.