Let’s assume for the sake of argument that Romney’s conversion is real and complete. What does it say about a man in politics that it takes him until he’s well into his fifties to make up his mind on a major matter of public policy? Does that seem like leadership?
That’s fine, but in fact, the evidence that his “conversion” is phony is overwhelming. He still supports destroying embryos, notwithstanding the language he uses to cloud that fact, and he still doesn’t support the fundamental American principle that all persons have a God-given and therefore unalienable right to life.
The founder of this forum was a registered Dem. until Clinton. I believe in conversions.