Posted on 08/09/2007 8:09:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
MITT ROMNEY is determined to prove he's pro-life. How about proving he's pro-truth?
Every time Romney tries to explain his evolution from supporter to opponent of abortion rights, his honesty comes into question. That's because his explanations over the years don't add up.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
I find that humorous, in context. After all, the Boston Globe was Romney's primary vehicle for getting his liberal message out when he was trying [successfully] to gain the support of Massachusetts liberals.
I don't know why anybody would be surprised that the Left has viciously turned on Mitt, since he has at least partially renounced his promised undying fealty to their pro-abort, pro-gay, agenda.
OK, so you answered yourself. The Boston Globe are Mitt-haters. How they came to be Mitt-haters is beside the point.
This is an obvious hit piece. It deserves no consideration beyond that.
Please enlighten us all on which facts of this piece are inaccurate?
Reread my post, slowly.
My point is this leftwing paper is hardly in a postion to question anyone’s ‘truthfulness’. Let alone on the topic of abortion, which it supports fully, including partial birth.
Sure it does. Because, it demonstrates once again why Romney would be such an awful pick as the Republican nominee.
As did Mitt, right up until the end of his one term as the liberal Governor of liberal Massachusetts. After all, it was just last year that Mitt signed his socialized medicine plan, complete with taxpayer-funded abortions, into law, with Uncle Teddy looking on approvingly.
I love your tag line about more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates in Mass. Ain’t that the truth. I don’t know if you’ve ever been there but those ARE the odds.
Abortion isn’t the end all decision matrix for me with any candidate.
Hmmmm . . . didn't know that. Last year. Taxpayers paying for abortions. Socialized medicine. Why do people buy the bull, hook, line, and sinker every time a candidate pretends to be conservative?
The Boston Globe taking someone to task on an “honesty problem”? Sounds like a pot and kettle story.
Your dead armadillo photo is a reference to a famous comment by well-known conservative (not) Jim Hightower. Maybe you should cite a different pundit.
Notice how the story and investigation about Mitt’s private police, is not in the news?
Yes I know what the point of your post was, to avoid the content and attack the messenger. Facts please.
Yes I know what the point of your post was, to avoid the content and attack the messenger.
So wrong its painful.
Hmmm...I'm sorry that the unalienable right to life, the most fundamental of all rights, takes that place in your priorities.
How about the fact that Romney signed a permanent "assault" weapons ban into law?
"Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people." - Mitt Romney
Still waiting for you to tell us what part of the content was inaccurate. Obviously, you can’t.
I have yet to decide who I’ll be voting for.
God forbid the paper that has done far more reporting on Mitt than any other over the last 20 years go back and dredge up a bunch of uncomfortable facts.
How dare they quote Romney!? How dare they catch Romney lying about his record?!?
Attack the messenger!
It is stunning how the Romney supporters react to ANY negative statement about him.
This guy is running for PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, people! If he, (and you) can't stand the heat of the PRIMARY CAMPAIGN, what are all of you doing in the kitchen!
Me neither. But I assure you that there will be an NHL franchise in Sheol before I will vote for Romney.
‘Still waiting for you to tell us what part of the content was inaccurate.’
I bet you are ‘waiting’. Since I didn’t claim anything like that in any post.
’ Obviously, you can’t.’
The only thing ‘obvious’ is you want to argue with a Romney supporter, for whatever reason.
I’ll suggest you ping one for that stuff.
My problem is with the hypocrisy of the Boston Globe as it relates to abortion, which it wholly supports in all its forms, on demand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.