Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'50% UK Asians reject mixed-race marriage'
Times of India ^ | 7 Aug 2007, 0209 hrs

Posted on 08/06/2007 9:35:03 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin

LONDON: Nearly half of British Asians would only marry someone of their own race, according to an ICM-BBC survey on Monday.

A total of 44% said they would not consider inter-racial marriage — almost five times higher than the figure for white Britons, of whom 9% said they would only marry within their race. But 53% of Britons with Asian origins said they would not mind a mixed-race marriage, compared to 87% for whites.

The survey probed 500 people aged under 34 living in UK who had roots in South Asia.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: asian; britain; europeanunion; interracialmarriage; nato; uk; unitedkingdom; yoots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Jack Hammer

“I’ve seen smart and I’ve seen lucky; lucky is better”

No argument from me : )


41 posted on 08/07/2007 4:23:14 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Oops, yes, thank you. Bad mistake on my part not to say something about that. You'll have to forgive me; I'm an American and we have different names for these various groups and nationalities.

I know when Brits refer to South Asians they are talking about Arabs, Bangladeshis, Iranians, etc. But they are also referring to Indians, which I knew but neglected for the reasons below.

But first, in my defense, and I know YOU haven't made the charge (but someone whom I shall not name came pretty darn close), that oversight does not make me a racist. My only point in all this was that muslim-nonmuslim marriages are for crazy people, not that interracial marriages in general are for crazy people. That's all I meant by it. Only that, and I apologize if anyone took it any other way.

Finally, what was this article about? What prompted the author to write it? Was it to educate and inform the public about the bad mojo that's going to come down on your head if you, a white Brit, marry a Hindu from New Delhi? No, I don't think so. There are thousands upon thousands of such marriages, which are successful and happy marriages. And they don't make the news.

There is only one kind of marriage between white Brits and South Asians which is in the news of late, which is a natural disaster waiting to happen, which everyone is thinking about, which everyone is reading about, which you'd have to be insane to enter into, and that is, my friend, a marriage between a muslim and a nonmuslim, in this case, white Brits.

If I'm guilty of anything it's reading between the lines, not racism.

42 posted on 08/07/2007 5:57:13 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SoldierMedic
The survey probed 500 people aged under 34 living in UK who had roots in South Asia.

The survey covered exclusively people from India and Pakistan

43 posted on 08/07/2007 5:59:57 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Open Season rocks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymLJz3N8ayI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Nope. We call middle easterners (surprise, surprise) “middle easterners”.


44 posted on 08/08/2007 6:02:15 AM PDT by ThatchersKiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ThatchersKiddie

I see. So Asians are Pakistanis, Indians, Bangladeshis and people from Sri Lanka? What about Afghans?


45 posted on 08/08/2007 6:04:13 AM PDT by SolidWood (UN delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

That’s right. Afghans would be Asians, too.

(Though a police report - for example - might say a middle easterner was ‘of Asian or middle eastern appearance’, as it’s difficult to tell somebody’s nationality by sight alone.)

Don’t worry, it even confuses us Brits sometimes!


46 posted on 08/09/2007 9:03:51 AM PDT by ThatchersKiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson