[theFIRMbss]

>The last thing we need is the WSJ turned into the sensationalistic drek that Fox News has become

The Wall Street Journal
has always done quite a few
editorials

defending people
accused of day care sex crimes.
And they tied that in

to the Libby case
in their editorials
defending Libby!

(The Journal's stance is
memory "experts" say we
can't trust memory

for important things
at all, not names and places
or who did sex crimes.)

The Wall Street Journal
has always had its version
of "sensational"

stories. Only they
give everything the veneer
of business world news.

[mysterio]

The Wall Street Journal has always had its version of "sensational"

Do you think Murdoch will make it less sensationalistic? His news network likes to sound thr breaking news gong every time a celebrity puppy poops on a fire hydrant.

Using the WSJ to go after the NYT? No, thanks. Just report the damned news.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

The Journal's stance is memory "experts" say we can't trust memory for important things

You can't.

Several video studies have been done on this. You should look them up. They are eye opening.