Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Murdoch Says He Just Wants More 'Urgency' in 'WSJ'
editorandpublisher.com ^ | August 04, 2007 9:40 AM ET | By E&P Staff

Posted on 08/04/2007 12:53:43 PM PDT by Vision

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Vision

“deeply conservative editorial page,”

that is b.s.

the editorial pages are pro and con, liberal and conservative, and committed to a free market.

the news content is liberal, as studies have shown.


21 posted on 08/04/2007 3:22:02 PM PDT by ken21 (b 4 fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21
...the Journal's cantankerous, provocative, deeply conservative editorial page...

Obviously, the people who wrote the posted article are typical drive-by media types themselves. "Editor and Publisher" is published by an MSM outlet, so such a description of the WSJ editorial page is not surprising.

22 posted on 08/04/2007 3:51:08 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Fox News is a positive force. Never said he was perfect. Since I’m not a tycoon I don’t have any power over this.


23 posted on 08/04/2007 4:22:04 PM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vision
Fox News is a positive force.

Relative to the networks and the other major cable news outlets, yes. But it it's all relative. Fox News, when it began, was more of a positive force than it is now.

24 posted on 08/04/2007 5:07:46 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Man you are a glass half empty guy.


25 posted on 08/04/2007 5:14:50 PM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
The Journal's stance is memory "experts" say we can't trust memory for important things

You can't.

Several video studies have been done on this. You should look them up. They are eye opening.

26 posted on 08/04/2007 5:19:02 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (A good marriage is like a casserole, only those responsible for it really know what goes into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vision
I just want to see him say this:

"Of course I won't wreck the WSJ, all I want is to stomp that putrid little puke Pinch Sulzberger into the ground, and to do that I need the WSJ to be greater than ever. When I get through with Pinch and his leftist butt buddies the New York Times won't even be used for fishwrap!"
27 posted on 08/04/2007 5:20:21 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Me too.


28 posted on 08/04/2007 5:37:01 PM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Yes, I confess to being a “glass half empty guy.” You always have to be critical when your opponent is the left and the MSM. You can never beat them if you are satisfied with half a loaf or less.


29 posted on 08/04/2007 5:55:09 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

“Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.” John 14:27


30 posted on 08/04/2007 6:13:47 PM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: P-40
The Wall Street Journal has always done quite a few editorials defending people accused of day care sex crimes. And they tied that in to the Libby case in their editorials defending Libby!
Defending the particular people accused of the particular "sex crimes" is IMHO honorable. By all reasonable accounts, the transcripts of the testimonies of the "victims" are simply not rationally credible; the testimonies don't make physical sense and don't accord with physical evidence. The "victims" were children bullied into accusing the adults. IMHO. One of the accused "offenders" who was finally vindicated, sort of, was railroaded by Janet Reno down in Florida, before she was tapped for Attorney General - and went on to accept being lied to by President Clinton, and being told to propagate those lies to the public. She must have accepted it; she didn't resign when the truth came out.
(The Journal's stance is memory "experts" say we can't trust memory for important things at all, not names and places or who did sex crimes.)
"Recovered memories" are particularly dangerous, being essentially the products of brainwashing. People can "know" things that simply ain't so.

31 posted on 08/04/2007 6:20:44 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

i didn’t see your quotes in the article.

i live in socal and remember the mcmartin case.

it turned out that the wsj was correct. they editorialized heavily, as you point out, for those accused.

within the last year the sunday lat mag had an article by one of the children who made accusations, now an adult. and he admitted to false witness.


32 posted on 08/04/2007 6:32:54 PM PDT by ken21 (b 4 fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

“He should wade away the many liberals at the WSJ (starting with John Harwood) and take direct aim at the New York Times.”

Yup, when the WSJ’s liberal staff writers threatened to walk, he should have said “bounce...get out of my building. You’re all replaceable”.

People buy the WSJ for two reasons...its editorial page, and its in depth stocks and business coverage. The generic liberal news reporters are easily replaceable.


33 posted on 08/04/2007 7:20:16 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
The generic liberal news reporters are easily replaceable.

They are all trained at the same ("institutions") schools anyway.

34 posted on 08/04/2007 10:23:42 PM PDT by jokar (for it is by grace, http://www.gbible.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ken21; P-40
i didn’t see your quotes in the article.
My quotes were not from the article but from P-40; the possibility of that confusion is why I tend to modify the FR convention of using italics when quoting the article or the reply which I'm responding to. When I quote the article, I prefer to us teletype (<tt>) rather than italics, so there will be a difference.
i live in socal and remember the mcmartin case.

it turned out that the wsj was correct. they editorialized heavily, as you point out, for those accused.

within the last year the sunday lat mag had an article by one of the children who made accusations, now an adult. and he admitted to false witness.

Thank you; P-40 obviously wasn't aware of that, and I didn't remember that detail myself.

35 posted on 08/05/2007 12:56:03 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Vision
I can't stand this a-shole and wish he would get deported back to Australia, pronto. Look forward to seeing stories about Lindsey Lohan and missing rich white girls in Aruba on the front cover, to say NOTHING of the Murdochian obsession with a Hillary/Rudy race!

The man is merely a richer and smarter version of Generoso Pope IMHO.

36 posted on 08/05/2007 1:01:34 AM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

I sure hope he’s not going to mess up the Journal. It is the one paper I can count on enjoying (well, I guess I’d have to add Investors Business Daily).


37 posted on 08/05/2007 4:34:46 PM PDT by Inkie (Attn Dems: Loose Lips Sink Ships -- but hey, I guess that's your goal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Think of it as adding a little artificial flavor to get more people to drink it.


38 posted on 08/07/2007 4:53:55 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
You want to ruin my day, and every day hereafter? The Sun just went up to a dollar, telling us on the same day that the Federal Reserve should mind its own business and go home, while I still have the big, fat Post for two bits, with its snarky, commonsense editorials and brilliant op-eds.
39 posted on 08/07/2007 5:02:10 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

What happenned to his mouth?!!!?

He spends a lot of time at airports?


40 posted on 10/10/2007 1:01:20 PM PDT by 2nd Ammendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson