Posted on 08/03/2007 12:48:30 PM PDT by AfterManyASummer
Gingrich says war on terror 'phony' Former speaker says energy independence is key
By BOB DEANS The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Published on: 08/03/07
Washington — Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Thursday the Bush administration is waging a "phony war" on terrorism, warning that the country is losing ground against the kind of Islamic radicals who attacked the country on Sept. 11, 2001.
A more effective approach, said Gingrich, would begin with a national energy strategy aimed at weaning the country from its reliance on imported oil and some of the regimes that petro-dollars support. • More Nation/World news
"None of you should believe we are winning this war. There is no evidence that we are winning this war," the ex-Georgian told a group of about 300 students attending a conference for collegiate conservatives.
Gingrich, who led the so-called Republican Revolution that won the GOP control of both houses of Congress in 1994 midterm elections, said more must be done to marshal national resources to combat Islamic militants at home and abroad and to prepare the country for future attack. He was unstinting in his criticism of his fellow Republicans, in the White House and on Capitol Hill.
"We were in charge for six years," he said, referring to the period between 2001 and early 2007, when the GOP controlled the White House and both houses of Congress. "I don't think you can look and say that was a great success."
Thursday's National Conservative Student Conference was sponsored by the Young America's Foundation, a Herndon, Va.-based group founded in the 1960s as a political counterpoint to the left-leaning activists who coalesced around the civil rights movement and opposition to the Vietnam War.
Gingrich retains strong support among conservatives and ranked fifth among possible Republican nominees behind former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, with the backing of 7 percent of those queried in a ABC News/Washington Post poll taken last week. The poll surveyed 403 Republicans and Republican-leaning adults nationwide and has a 5 percentage-point margin of error.
"I believe we need to find leaders who are prepared to tell the truth ... about the failures of the performance of Republicans ... failed bureaucracies ... about how dangerous the world is," he said when asked what kind of Republican he would back for president.
Gingrich has been promoting a weekly political newsletter he calls "Winning the Future." It's available free to those who leave their e-mail addresses at
www.winningthefuture
.net, one of several Web sites he is connected with or operating. Gingrich began writing the newsletter in April 2006, and it now goes out to 311,000 readers each week, said Gingrich spokesman Rick Tyler.
Political salon
At another Web site — www.americansolutions
.com — Gingrich is running a virtual political salon, with video clips, organizational information and contacts revolving around his conservative vision for the country's future. It asks supporters to join in an Internet "Solutions Day" on Sept. 27, the anniversary of Gingrich's so-called Contract With America, a slate of conservative policies he led through Congress as speaker of the House a decade and a half ago.
"What I'm trying to start is a new dialogue that is evidence-based," Gingrich said Thursday. "It doesn't start from the right wing, it doesn't start from the left wing," he said, but is an effort to get politicians and voters to "look honestly at the evidence of what isn't working and tell us how to change it."
Gingrich was interrupted with applause once, when he called for an end to the biting partisanship critics say has polarized national politics and paralyzed the workings of government.
"We have got to get past this partisan baloney, where I'm not allowed to say anything good about Hillary Clinton because 'I'm not a loyal Republican,' and she's not allowed to say anything good about me, or she's not a 'loyal' Democrat. What a stupid way to run a country."
He reserved his most pointed criticism for the administration's handling of the global campaign against terrorist groups.
"We've been engaged in a phony war," said Gingrich. "The only people who have been taking this seriously are the combat military."
His remarks seemed to reflect, in part, the findings of a National Intelligence Estimate made public last month.
In the estimate, the U.S. intelligence community concluded that six years of U.S. efforts to degrade the al-Qaida terrorist group had left the organization constrained but still potent, having "protected or regenerated" the capability to attack the United States in ways that have left the country "in a heightened threat environment."
"We have to take this seriously," said Gingrich.
"We used to be a serious country. When we got attacked at Pearl Harbor, we took on Imperial Japan, Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany," he said, referring to World War II.
"We beat all three in less than four years. We're about to enter the seventh year of this phony war against ... [terrorist groups], and we're losing."
Successful approach
Gingrich said he would lay out in a Sept. 10 speech what a successful U.S. approach to this threat would have looked like over the past six years.
"First of all, we have to have a national energy strategy, which basically says to the Saudis, 'We're not going to rely on you,' " he said.
The United States imports about 14 million barrels of oil a day, making up two-thirds of its total consumption.
“Sorry, he is simply right.”
He is. This Administration has allowed the left to dictate the public opinion of the efforts thus far. While we are winning on the ground, we are losing in perception.
Newt was a really sharp guy, what happened?
“and surrender mentality that she is going to win no matter what is very destructive for our side.”
I agree with that 100%
Ego over intelligence. Happens all the time...
I’m also with the two of you.
Newt has ADD and can’t keep on one topic long enough to have to explain his stand. IF becoming energy independent had been easy, it would have been done back in the 70’s.
Don’t know about you, but I was very happy the Newt and the Reps shut down the government. Some leftards think it was a bad thing. No way. America still went on minus the beltway. It was a great moment in our history. I hope it happens again soon.
Agree. He wasn’t bright enough to stop his political demise.
The problem was that the MSM totally misrepresented what had happened. Clinton was the one who really shut down the government with his veto of the budget bill, but the media spun it so that everyone blamed those “evil” Republicans. Unfortunately, the whole episode turned out to be a positive for WJC and a negative for the Pubbies.
The U. S. set up a lightening rod in Iraq and the jihadists are swarming around it like flies on a floodlight. Bang, we kill them daily.
What’s phony about that?
Maybe Newt is trying to get a market share of Ron Paul’s poll numbers, or a running mate position. They’re sounding a lot alike. This is all quite humorous, really.
Shove it up your arse, Newt. Just try not to soil your manicured dishpan hands.
“We were in charge for six years,” he said, referring to the period between 2001 and early 2007, when the GOP controlled the White House and both houses of Congress. “I don’t think you can look and say that was a great success.”
That makes sense. Glad to know that Gingrich hasn’t adopted Edwards’ “the War on Terror is a bumper sticker” mantra.
I’m very tired of Newt pretending to be a “genius”. he’s as dumb as the average RAT.
“And what he meant by that is that we are pulling our punches.”
I agree with your assessment of what he meant, and believe that he is correct.
He is absolutely right. The war in Iraq is leading to a brutal civil war and complete and total repression and persecution of the few remaining Christians in Iraq.
He is right.
Cutting dependence on mid east oil is essential.
Controlling our borders is absolutely essential.
I do agree that we’re not fighting the war on terror right. We should redeploy our Iraq troops to Pakistan. Find Osama and the rest of AlQueda there, and dismantle their nuke program.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.