[lowbridge]

Does this mean that the Viking Kitties are figments of our imagination?

[sono]

Penn and Teller would need a whole season devoted to BOR.

[mkjessup]

If anybody needs someone to 'monitor' them, it is O'Reilly.

For a real revealing blast from the past, visit The Smoking Gun website and look up the court papers that were filed when former FOX producer Andrea Mackris sued O'Reilly for sexual harassment, it exposes O'Reilly for what he is:

SCUM

This will get you started:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

Here is a specific item that will have you rolling your eyes:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris16.html

So who is monitoring Bill O'Reilly? I wouldn't be surprised if it was a detective hired by his wife.

Now some might say that this is making it a little personal, and you know what folks?

O'Reilly made it personal when he slandered every Freeper on this website, and our Founder too.

Yeah, it's personal BOR, and now it's gonna stay that way.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Someone should direct him to my favorite thread.....

Behind the scenes of a Zot:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1674019/posts

[PeterPrinciple]

As Ronald Reagan would say about someone who threw a tantrum ............. I wonder what is bothering them? and continue on his way doing his own thing.

[savedbygrace]

Loofah, loofah, loofah, loofah . . . .

[RetSignman]

What BOR fails to recognize is that Free Republic IS a monitor. We monitor the MSM and news, in general, and rip the facade off it’s leftist slant.

We expose agendas and bring forward, into the light of day, the truth behind musings of the left and whining by BOR will not deter the mission but help bring the this site more into the public view.

[Actually_in_Tokyo]

That is a great cartoon!!!

[Antoninus]

My guess is that Bill finds the criticisms of him more cuttingly accurate here on FR than on DailyKos—and more of a danger to his livelihood. While we, who are or have been audience members, call him a bumbling phony conservative who puts up a bold front but is pathetic and lily-livered underneath, the Kossacks, who have never and will never watch his show, just say he’s a FascistNaziRacistSexistYaddaYadda. Their criticisms are so predictable that they’re meaningless.

[RedStateRocker]

The jerk is a piece of work. Just being correct on some issues does not preclude one from being a twit.

[P-Marlowe]

Here is a clip of Bill O'Reilly saying "I hate Blacks" on Television.

O'Reilly needs a monitor.

[dfwgator]

"FreeRepublic Needs A Monitor. It Has None."

[Fawn]

It could be worse. This idiot O’Reilly could still be teaching our kids.

[Savage Beast]

The chaos of unbridled Free Speech throws control freaks into a panic.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

I think this whole think is projection.

Bill O’Reilly needs a Monitor Lizard. He has none.

Is there an exotic pet dealer among the FReepers?

Salamander, would you check among your relatives for volunteers?

[A.A. Cunningham]

Loofahman hasn't a clue.

[StructuredChaos]

I think that before jumping all over Bill we should determine why he thinks this site needs a monitor.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

What good would more monitors do when O'Reilly's people search for strings of characters with no regard of context, for example a poster might mention Cushitic as an Afro-Asiatic language -- O'Reilly complains of four letter words on FR.

Good example of that is the O'Reilly charge of "hate" when his people found the string of characters, "I hate blacks" on FR. Never mind that it was a substring of a column title ("Why I Hate Blacks") in a San Francisco Asian publication. The FR thread was discussing the column and its author. Fox News John Gibson interviewed the author, cannot it be said that Fox News is a "hate" organization? Go figure.

[Lazamataz]

Bill, you hyperventilating, obnoxious blowhard:

[Lurker]

Bill O'Reilly needs an enema.

L

[longtermmemmory]

OReily is just threatened by “amature journalists”. He thinks the “professional” journalists are much better at telling you what is important.

OReily is just parroting what Elton John is demanding, “shut down the internet.” There are too many people doing my job.

FR does Oreily’s job 100% better, more efficiently, without commercial interuption, and subject to far more credible peer review.

Oreily is a tabloid TV hack. Yellow journalism, ambush interviews, and fake controversies (ala M.Moore) are his stock and trade.

His brain is like any other talking hairstyle, dedicated to protect ratings NOT inform the public. FR is a threat to him and must be attacked. Remember he was attacking Rush around the time his radio show was taking off. Is it still even going or does he still have to pay to be on air?