[wideawake]

True, and you don't beat up, shoot at or try to kill a male that your daughter chose to have sex with.

Whether or not his daughter chose to have intercourse with an intruder on his property, the individual in question is still an intruder on his property.

[jude24]

the individual in question is still an intruder on his property.

Nope. He was invited by a legal occupant.

[piytar]

an intruder on his property

Absolutely completely 100% wrong: If your spouse or responsible kid (17 yr. old definitely counts) invites someone into your house, they are NOT an intruder and you cannot shoot them for being there. Sheesh.

[dmz]

Whether or not his daughter chose to have intercourse with an intruder on his property, the individual in question is still an intruder on his property.
________

Um, wideawake, the girl invited him in. Where are you getting the intruder stuff from?

[wtc911]

Whether or not his daughter chose to have intercourse with an intruder on his property, the individual in question is still an intruder on his property.

_________________________________________________

Not if the daughter invited him inside (the house). This guy is a major league asshole and will hopefully get what he deserves.

for the record, I'm the father of three grown girls. I've thrown some boys out, never needed a stick to do it and never would even think about getting one of the guns.

How many freepers ever diddled their girl while the old-folks were asleep? My hand is raised.

[Mark was here]

Whether or not his daughter chose to have intercourse with an intruder on his property, the individual in question is still an intruder on his property.

The paralyzed man was an invited guest of the mans daughter, if she exceeded her authority in inviting guests over his problem is with her.

He should of crippled his daughter to make it clear to her, that she cannot invite folks over.