Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy

You can generally read a site’s worth by looking at what is posted there and then the reactions to the negative posts. Yes, FreeRepublic has had it’s share of negative posts, but after each one other posters came along to condemn that which was inappropriate.

The leftist sights have negative posts. They are bound to. What you don’t see is an objection to them. About all you see is kudos for the person who made the post, and then perhaps an addendum that degenerates still lower. Much of this is categorized as shockingly inappropriate.

During the whole Clinton Presidence I don’t remember anyone advocating Clinton die. Can’t remember how many times I’ve seen it said that Bush should be.

FR is tame compared the leftist sites. Reason generally rules here. It seldom does over there.


80 posted on 08/01/2007 12:12:58 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
I don’t remember anyone advocating Clinton die.

Sheeeeeee. Gonzo got a visit from the feds for it and he wasn't the first. It happened but Jim stayed on it. The lefty forums are controlled by crazy people. You expect that behavior from them. It's funny when they talk about impeaching the President and they have no idea why he should be impeached. Their hate has no foundation at all.

87 posted on 08/01/2007 12:20:26 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson