Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody; xzins; blue-duncan
I'm positive he did NOT find the statement "I hate blacks" unless he took it out of context (like "I hate blacks who . . ." which could have even been posted by a black conservative).

The "I Hate Blacks" comment is found on THIS THREAD.

The "Homosexuals are dogs" comment can be found on THIS THREAD

Notice that neither of those comments were made by freepers. They were statements reported in the articles that were posted.

O'Reilly is as dishonest as the day is long. It may be that he was suckerd by his staff, but he claimed that these statements were somehow typical of the kind of stuff that freepers post here, which, IMO, is actionable libel.

419 posted on 08/01/2007 10:29:52 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

Well it is very distressing to me as I am a very active in my community and have told many people about this site, i.e. my representatives office.

I will be upset if someone watched the segment and then asks me why I frequent a so called ‘hate’ site and told them they should join in.


424 posted on 08/01/2007 10:44:29 AM PDT by texasgil (No, I won't back down....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe
O'Reilly is as dishonest as the day is long. It may be that he was suckerd by his staff,

Regardless, how can anyone now trust any of his future reports/ on-air campaigns? And in what other ways may he have misled his audience in the past?

The novelty of his act wore off some time ago for me and I stopped making a point of tuning in, but I will now avoid his show on principle.

428 posted on 08/01/2007 10:56:43 AM PDT by Dysart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

I’ve watched O’Reilly from when he started. He said those postings he cited were from that very day.

Not only is the posting charge incorrect, the charge is clearly nonsense. And he was waving the paper like he had the “facts” of it there.

He really, really needs to be corrected.


478 posted on 08/01/2007 4:08:46 PM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

Great catches.


504 posted on 08/02/2007 1:06:32 PM PDT by syriacus (If the US troops had remained in S. Korea in 1949, there would have been no Korean War (1950-53).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson