To: GunRunner
“Did you call them agents of Satan “
No, but I did notice that Mr Leakey, when trying to prove he found a very old monkey skull, had to do his carbon dating over 50 times before he received a very old date that he liked - ha ha ha.
117 posted on
08/03/2007 4:58:04 AM PDT by
razzle
(Liberal Science: Experiments on unborn babies, man-made global warming, and darwinism.)
To: razzle
No, but I did notice that Mr Leakey, when trying to prove he found a very old monkey skull, had to do his carbon dating over 50 times before he received a very old date that he liked - ha ha ha.It couldn't have been very old if he was doing carbon dating.
119 posted on
08/03/2007 6:08:49 AM PDT by
js1138
To: razzle
I did notice that Mr Leakey, when trying to prove he found a very old monkey skull, had to do his carbon dating over 50 times before he received a very old date that he liked - ha ha ha. You have blown any scientific credibility to which you pretended with this post.
First, Leakey did not do his own radiometric dating. That type of dating is done by experienced geologists and nuclear physicists or chemists.
Second, everyone knows that you don't date million-year-old fossils with "carbon dating" -- radiocarbon dating is only useful back about 50,000 years, and does not work on volcanic rocks, which is what they date in Africa!
121 posted on
08/03/2007 7:30:32 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: razzle
So you do acknowledge that many elements have half lives of millions of years, which makes a 6,000 year old Earth highly unlikely.
128 posted on
08/03/2007 2:43:19 PM PDT by
GunRunner
(Come on Fred, how long are you going to wait?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson