Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

Oh dear - so this is how CREVO battles begin?

Great Home Page Coyote - I found this very enlightening.
Thanks;)

Radiometric Dating
A Christian Perspective
Dr. Roger C. Wiens
Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences
California Institute of Technology


75 posted on 07/29/2007 11:43:02 AM PDT by sodpoodle ( Despair - man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: sodpoodle
I found this very enlightening. Thanks ;)

Radiometric Dating...

If you have any questions on radiocarbon dating, I do a lot of it and would be happy to share what I have learned.

76 posted on 07/29/2007 11:50:28 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle
Evolution is faith based as is creation.

Science does not have any proof of origins or evolution.

Origins can not be reproduced and no one was there to observe them.

Evolution has never been witnessed, (that is macro evolution changing from one species to another, micro evolution which is a bad term for adaption or variation is not evolution.) there is not one intermediate species in the world, there is not one intermediate species in the fossil record.

With billions of years there would be countless intermediate fossils like the licken or chizard.

And Coyotemans Radiometric dating is a science of unprovable tests. Where is a test specimen that one can calibrate these test by.

Realize this specimen must have a know date stamped on it our a documentation by a person who was there at the formation of the specimen.

All the dating methods are flawed from the beginning of the test, first it is assumed that the subject was pure from the start, then it is assumed that all daughter elements are the product of decay (no leaching in or out), and also the dating methods can only deal with the here and now and have to assume that not large scale events of the past could effect the out come to the to sample.

It is known that the magnetic field is decaying, evolutionist will tell you it cycles weaker, stronger, weaker, which there is no proof for, they will tell you the magnetic lines in the earth are there proof. But that is not a proof but an observation of an event with a presupposition interpretation.

If this be the case then radioactive decay must follow this same process.

I know the both are not, as I know the 1st and 2nd laws of thermo dynamics only apply to those who believe in creation, evolution alway seems to be able to over come these obstacles
78 posted on 07/29/2007 12:08:43 PM PDT by Creationist ( Evolution is a faith based science with no proof. Scientist are the prophets, teachers the preacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: sodpoodle

http://www.icr.org/article/200/


86 posted on 07/29/2007 12:24:40 PM PDT by Creationist ( Evolution is a faith based science with no proof. Scientist are the prophets, teachers the preacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson