Replies

Evolution is faith based as is creation.

Science does not have any proof of origins or evolution.

Origins can not be reproduced and no one was there to observe them.

Evolution has never been witnessed, (that is macro evolution changing from one species to another, micro evolution which is a bad term for adaption or variation is not evolution.) there is not one intermediate species in the world, there is not one intermediate species in the fossil record.

With billions of years there would be countless intermediate fossils like the licken or chizard.

And Coyotemans Radiometric dating is a science of unprovable tests. Where is a test specimen that one can calibrate these test by.

Realize this specimen must have a know date stamped on it our a documentation by a person who was there at the formation of the specimen.

All the dating methods are flawed from the beginning of the test, first it is assumed that the subject was pure from the start, then it is assumed that all daughter elements are the product of decay (no leaching in or out), and also the dating methods can only deal with the here and now and have to assume that not large scale events of the past could effect the out come to the to sample.

It is known that the magnetic field is decaying, evolutionist will tell you it cycles weaker, stronger, weaker, which there is no proof for, they will tell you the magnetic lines in the earth are there proof. But that is not a proof but an observation of an event with a presupposition interpretation.

If this be the case then radioactive decay must follow this same process.

I know the both are not, as I know the 1st and 2nd laws of thermo dynamics only apply to those who believe in creation, evolution alway seems to be able to over come these obstacles

>>
And Coyotemans Radiometric dating is a science of unprovable tests. Where is a test specimen that one can calibrate these test by.<<

Actually I’ve done radiometric dating - there is an error band around estimates but since no natural process can speed up or slow down decay its pretty darn accurate - and checkable with recent samples. Its also repeatable and can be checked by various teams.