Skip to comments.
House of Representatives Tightens Protections for Dogs and Cats in Farm Bill
Humane Society of the United States HSUS ^
| july 28th, 2007
| DancesWithCats
Posted on 07/28/2007 9:11:27 AM PDT by DancesWithCats
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
I know that the farm bill is not perfect and needs a good overhaul to eliminate the pork, but these amendments would do good things for our animals and needs to be passed, IMHO.
To: DancesWithCats
Emotionality about pets as apposed to livestock should not be encoded into law.
2
posted on
07/28/2007 9:13:52 AM PDT
by
Weeedley
To: DancesWithCats
This also supports our efforts to underscore that humane treatment of animals is an important aspect of our culture and also that animal cruelty must be monitored and dealt with as it correlates so highly to abuse of humans.
3
posted on
07/28/2007 9:14:27 AM PDT
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(The truth about men who watch or set up dogfights.......they can't get it up !)
To: DancesWithCats
There’s a difference between “animal rights” and “animal welfare”. These provisions sound like they are promoting “animal welfare”. They sound good to me.
4
posted on
07/28/2007 9:16:02 AM PDT
by
samtheman
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: DancesWithCats
And every single thing is now a federal matter. Screw the constitution, it's for the children kittens.
6
posted on
07/28/2007 9:16:55 AM PDT
by
flashbunny
(<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
To: DancesWithCats
Reminds me of the national anti-vivasection ads.
7
posted on
07/28/2007 9:17:57 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
("Bah weep graaagnah wheep ni ni bong.")
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
With what we legalized as a woman’s right to choose, I have serious doubts to the argument that a culture’s treatment of animals correlates to abuse of humans. should be the other way around.
8
posted on
07/28/2007 9:18:27 AM PDT
by
huldah1776
(Worthy is the Lamb.)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Agreed! This is one federal law I can actually applaud.
9
posted on
07/28/2007 9:18:46 AM PDT
by
Tabi Katz
To: EGPWS
Another dog-fighting proponent, I presume?
10
posted on
07/28/2007 9:18:52 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: DancesWithCats
"Animals in research must be treated humanely,... Mmmm animals and humans are the same.
we're all animals/humans after all.
11
posted on
07/28/2007 9:19:51 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: EGPWS
In my experience, those who beat their dogs, cats and/or horses tend to treat their families the same way.
12
posted on
07/28/2007 9:21:37 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: Tabi Katz
This is one federal law I can actually applaud.Yeah, any other promotion via lawmakers be damned to to the back burner for lack of concern.
13
posted on
07/28/2007 9:22:16 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: MizSterious
The Fabianist will outlaw hunting with dogs and other uses of animals in the future. Thats the way of a large Fed.
14
posted on
07/28/2007 9:22:26 AM PDT
by
BGHater
(Bread and Circuses)
To: BGHater
What on earth is a Fabianist? Fan of Fabian? Is he still around?
15
posted on
07/28/2007 9:23:32 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: MizSterious
A gradual approach to socialism. What we have now.
16
posted on
07/28/2007 9:25:17 AM PDT
by
BGHater
(Bread and Circuses)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
I just check my handy dandy pocket sized copy of the US Constitution and I'm unable to find the words 'agriculture', 'pets', or 'medical research' anywhere in Article 3, Section 8.
Strangely my copy also lacks the words 'farm subsidies' entirely.
I wonder if Congress is working from a different document because whatever it is they're using it sure as Hell isn't the US Constitution.
L
17
posted on
07/28/2007 9:26:22 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to ebola.)
To: BGHater
How is humane treatment of animals “socialism” pray tell? What else would you exclude from humane treatment? Wives? Kids? The unborn?
18
posted on
07/28/2007 9:26:31 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: Weeedley
Emotionality about pets as apposed to livestock should not be encoded into law. Absolutely it should. How would you feel if you had to give your dog or cat away because of changed circumstances only to have it end up in a lab? That's how these 'Class B' dealers work - they troll newspapers looking for 'free to a good home' ads.
Laws should and do reflect society's values & our feelings toward companion animals are part of this.
19
posted on
07/28/2007 9:27:45 AM PDT
by
BearCub
To: MizSterious
In my experience, those who beat their dogs, cats and/or horses tend to treat their families the same way. Rest at ease replying to me for my Husky is spoiled rotten and loves life at my expense.
He allows me the chore to take care of human concerns and appreciates my care taking of him.
I protect him from the silly day to day political fervor insistent in promoting an agenda.
20
posted on
07/28/2007 9:28:22 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-102 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson