To: kddid
Why waste all that bomb bay space, put a few 100 mega ton nukes in there and be sure you get what you're after.
10 posted on
07/26/2007 7:06:48 PM PDT by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: boomop1
There’s the pesky problem of the fallout cloud. Much better to have no fallout.
I don’t want us to occupy Iran. Hell, let’s just bomb it and let the UN play with it. It can be their problem, give them something to do.
12 posted on
07/26/2007 7:09:15 PM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: boomop1
Iran wants nukes? Our B-2s deliver nukes in 24 hours or they’re free.
27 posted on
07/26/2007 7:29:35 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
To: boomop1
put a few 100 mega ton nukes We don't have any and never did.
40 posted on
07/26/2007 8:03:58 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
(Ask the OB guy.)
To: boomop1
Why waste all that bomb bay space, put a few 100 mega ton nukes in there and be sure you get what you're after. A This thing is probably about the size a modern 100 MT nuke would be, if we had any.
Actually many 10 or 100 KT nukes would be better. If they too were hardened bunker busters.
44 posted on
07/26/2007 8:14:33 PM PDT by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: boomop1
Why waste all that bomb bay space, put a few 100 mega ton nukes in there and be sure you get what you're after. Nukes are too scary for too many voters.
Too many politicians love their jobs more than they love our country. They won't have the spine to use nukes until we've lost millions to one ourselves.
I mean that.
Chamerlain wasn't the only fool in denial at exactly the wrong time.
60 posted on
07/26/2007 9:18:21 PM PDT by
TChris
(The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson