[leadpenny]

I disagree. This doesn’t seem to be about Tillman anymore. It’s about a possible cover-up and it’s about officers - General Officers - possibly making false statements.

[ChuckHam]

Come on, you know just as well as I do that this isn’t about anything else but bringing discredit on our military and the war. Did some GO mess up? Yep, no doubt. They should be retired. With that said this is getting this kind of play for no other reason than it meets the agenda of the antiwar forces in our country.

[Finny]

Whoa, what coverup? There's a clear contradition here: Either they were under enemy fire, or all of this happened under friendly fire, which is an oxymoron. All I see is a disgruntled woman poking at an old wound.

[SevenMinusOne]

No it isn't about Ranger Tillman. It is about doing anything and everything the MSM can to run down the current war efforts. If that means making a mountain out of a mole hill...so be it.

And that is exactly what is happening here. The notion that "how far up in the Bush Administration" did this "cover-up" go (non-cover-up that is, considering the reality that Ranger Tillman was killed via blue on blue was told within a month....Far faster than plenty of other ruled blue on blue deaths).

That you seemingly want to go down this road and help give it fuel leads me to start believing what others have insisted to me previously (where I have tempted instead to give you the benefit of the doubt).

There is no large scale cover-up. This has nothing to do with the Bush Administration. Ranger Tillman was not purposely killed.....These notions are disgusting and serve no other purpose than a political agenda. Period. Full Stop.