Were you interested in his answer enough to listen to it. She asked a question and interjected a secondary question in the middle of it. He answered the first question (the part about being a member of CFR) and dismissed the secondary question. CFR is a think-tank much like AEI and several others. It has no regulatory power and and "plans" it has for NAU or anything else are of no more or less importance than the plans or proposals of any other think-tank.
When she started in with the whole WTC-7 was an inside job nonsense she made Fred look even smarter with his decision to dismiss the whole CFR's plans for NAU part of her question.
By the way, thanks for posting the video.
"She asked a question and interjected a secondary question in the middle of it. He answered the first question (the part about being a member of CFR) and dismissed the secondary question. CFR is a think-tank much like AEI and several others. It has no regulatory power and and "plans" it has for NAU or anything else are of no more or less importance than the plans or proposals of any other think-tank."
VRW, I hear you and follow your reasoning but I'd prefer to hear it from Fred. FR is a premiere conservative site. Time for spinning is over, I want to hear it fron Fred. I don't want to hear, "what he meant was", or "what he was trying to say was". Let the man stand on his on two feet and present his positions to the electorate. This election is too important for the cheerleaders to decide.
I was perfectly satisfied with his answer. The Hunteristas and Paulistas aren’t happy with anything short of “kill the CFR bastards”