Ok, but what the hell does that mean? The man never addressed the question. Don't get me wrong I'm not anti-Fred, but honestly it's getting real hard to get behind this guy. Even Rudy takes a position on issues. I don't agree with him but at least I can have a score card. This guy won't commit to anything. His indecisiveness will kill him. We don't need a guy who is still learning who he is and what he stands for at 60 plus years. I need a guy who knows who he is, puts it on the table and let's the voters decide. The whole "fear me because I was on a TV series and I might run gimmick" is getting old.
Actually, it does if you understand the CFR.. they aren't the big boogie-man trying to control the world people make it out to be..they are a think tank and they produce research papers on many sides of both issues.. for example, the infamous NAU document, not to many people have actually read the conclusions or counter articles where they show this is 1 option, but they also have options for each nation to close the borders, they have trade only options, they have expanded NORAD options (to include Mexico in the US/Canada NORAD relationship).. they have a lot of viewpoints listed for this.. it is a research article, not a plan of action.
Sure he answered the question. I didn’t think it was all that great a question but if your interested black helicopters and the government blowing up the World Trade center I guess it would concern you.
He did address the question. The question was about his membership in CFR? He addressed that - it is a think-tank, he is a member, he is also a member of AEI. Membership in think-tanks is all about exchange of ideas and viewpoints.