(:
1 posted on
07/18/2007 3:30:57 PM PDT by
Vision
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: Vision
2 posted on
07/18/2007 3:32:37 PM PDT by
Clara Lou
(Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
To: Vision
Oh yeah, that is going to go over real well with Black voters. Way to go Hussien, way to go.
4 posted on
07/18/2007 3:33:57 PM PDT by
elizabetty
(The funding dried up and I can no longer afford Tagline Messages.)
To: Vision
Can you spell ‘liberal’? This is the kind of thing that should be used against this foolish man. And what is ‘age-appropriate’ sex education for kindergarteners? Somehow, I don’t think this man is heading for the White House.
To: Vision
OOHH!! That’s gonna make a GREAT bumper sticker!
My Oldest just got out of Kindergarten two months ago. It was bad enough that they were teaching about, “Mother Earth,” and all of the treehugging environMENTAList crap. This guy needs to be slapped.
6 posted on
07/18/2007 3:35:22 PM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Satisfaction was my sin)
To: Vision
This guy is a loon. He hasn’t a chance to win.
7 posted on
07/18/2007 3:35:40 PM PDT by
JRochelle
(Vacant Lott needs to be evicted from the Senate.)
To: Vision
Maybe he remembers playing with himself in the bathtub, wondering what to do with it.
9 posted on
07/18/2007 3:36:47 PM PDT by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: Vision
Speaking as a Mom, I can’t think of anything more destructive to a young child’s development than to sexualize them at too early an age. Kindergartners aren’t even aware of sex. Why teach them anything at this point? Let them have their innocence. This ‘Sex, any way, with anyone at anytime’ mentality is what has brought us a generation that has no deeper attachment to their spouse than the physical one. We Baby Boomers are to blame. Kids need to realize that sex for sex sake is pretty empty. Deep emotional attachment is more likely to last.
11 posted on
07/18/2007 3:37:03 PM PDT by
originalbuckeye
(I want a hero....I'm holding out for a hero (politically))
To: Vision
Obama was proceeding cautiously until recent days when he made a sharp left turn. He said something very kooky last week, can’t remember what it was ,and now this. Do internal polls show him losing the kooks to Hillary ?
To: Vision
Reminds me of a scene from Governator’s movie, Kindergarten Cop, where one of the kids keeps saying, “boys have penis, girls have vagina...”
16 posted on
07/18/2007 3:39:22 PM PDT by
paudio
To: Vision
Kindergatern age kids generally figure out that boys and girls are different on their own. That’s about as age appropriate as it gets.
18 posted on
07/18/2007 3:40:16 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: Vision
“as long as it is “age-appropriate,” is “the right thing to do.”
Barbee and Ken like to dance with their clothes off. Sometimes when Barbee is gone Bruce comes over and dances with Ken.
19 posted on
07/18/2007 3:40:25 PM PDT by
Rb ver. 2.0
(eHarmony reject)
To: Vision
There is no such thing as age appropriate sex education for kindergartners.
21 posted on
07/18/2007 3:41:47 PM PDT by
Maceman
To: Vision
What's
with sex education?
Chapter One-
Boys put their wangus into a girls' thingy and if you're not lucky, a baby happens.
It's OK if you're married and you want a baby ... not so good if you're just 'doing it'.
Boy and boy ... eventually you'll die ... AIDS or suicide
Girl and girl ... More likely suicide.
Stick with boy/girl.
Chapter Two-
The End
(1/2 credit)
22 posted on
07/18/2007 3:42:33 PM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: Vision
An old evil of limousine liberalism rears its ugly head again.
23 posted on
07/18/2007 3:43:13 PM PDT by
DesScorp
To: Vision
Question: If the government is supposed to stay out of bedrooms, why is the government nosing around in bedroom matters here?
Question 2: Why do liberals get away with such obvious contradictions?
24 posted on
07/18/2007 3:44:02 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Vision
The only thing about sex that a 4 or 5 y/o should know is the difference between girls and boys.
To: Vision
Liberals actually believe that the problem is too little focus on sexuality in this society. Meanwhile we can’t even safely send our kids to public schools. It’s ultimately a tax on conservatives since we pay for the public schools and can’t use them.
From the liberal perspective, it must be amazing that the human race was able to reproduce itself before sex-education was put in place in the public schools, all those syphillis infected teenagers thinking the stork brought babies while they beat up lesbians for fun.
26 posted on
07/18/2007 3:46:15 PM PDT by
Greg F
(<><)
To: Vision
Why do innocent children need to be bombarded with concepts they are too immature to comprehend?
What purpose could this possibly serve?
28 posted on
07/18/2007 3:46:48 PM PDT by
SaveTheChief
(Chief Illiniwek (1926-2007))
To: Vision
In addition to local schools informing kindergarteners that babies do not come from the stork, the state legislation Obama supported in Illinois, which contained an "opt out" provision for parents, also envisioned teaching kindergarteners about "inappropriate touching," according to Obama's presidential campaign. Despite Obama's support, the legislation was not enacted. Taught by Bill Clinton and Mark Foley!
33 posted on
07/18/2007 3:50:33 PM PDT by
Dengar01
To: Vision
We should just reject this line of debate altogether. The Federal government shouldn’t have a role in educating our kids, and a man running for president shouldn’t have a role in teaching our kids about sex.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson