Skip to comments.
Flag cup with 'F' at Carnegie Museum draws complaints
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^
| 7/17/2007
| Craig Smith
Posted on 07/17/2007 1:35:58 AM PDT by chief_bigfoot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
The arts and croissant crowd at it again. Of course with funding help from the Heinz Endowments, and the National Endowment for the Arts among others....
To: chief_bigfoot
Is there anything more boring and predictable than an “artist” who tries to shock our sensibilities by being vulgar?
2
posted on
07/17/2007 1:42:14 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(When Hillary loses, she can retire, finally dump Bill, and find love in the arms of a new man...)
To: chief_bigfoot
Odd, but they seem to have the common sense not to use the 'N' word! These folks are for "freedom of speech" as long as the proper people are offended.
To: chief_bigfoot
a href="http://www.communistgoals.com/goals/goals.htm">The communist goals entered into the Congressional record by Albert Herlong, Jr. (a Floridian who served in Congress from 1949-69 Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35; January 10, 1963 From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen ).
Number 23:
Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
Number 22:
Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings," substitute shapeless, awkward, and meaningless forms.
4
posted on
07/17/2007 1:56:08 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: chief_bigfoot
5
posted on
07/17/2007 1:56:19 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: the_Watchman
Candice is offended way too easily.
To: gridlock
No, there isn’t. There is nothing more pathetic, either. Of course, all you have to do is wrap mediocrity in fashionable America-bashing and, voila, instant credibility.
7
posted on
07/17/2007 2:19:50 AM PDT
by
drew
To: the_Watchman
That’s right. Can you imagine if a conservative artist made a replica of the AIDS quilt with the word “Faggot” scrawled across it? Do you think the liberals would be saying, “What a wonderful example of free speech?”
Hell, no!
8
posted on
07/17/2007 3:33:53 AM PDT
by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(Forget the fence....Build a wall from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico.)
To: chief_bigfoot
My, how transgressive. (Suppresses yawn).
9
posted on
07/17/2007 4:13:12 AM PDT
by
wideawake
To: chief_bigfoot
The “artist” didn’t have the cajones to fill the glass up with urine and drop a page of the Koran into it?
Wonder why not?
(What an “artistic” wimp.)
10
posted on
07/17/2007 4:23:59 AM PDT
by
PBRSTREETGANG
(Apparently my former party considers me an "ugly nativist".)
To: chief_bigfoot
Grab the cup, smash it on the ground and call it freedom of speech.
To: sergeantdave
“Grab the cup, smash it on the ground and call it freedom of speech.”
You could probably get away with it if you called it performance art instead.
To: chief_bigfoot
13
posted on
07/17/2007 5:12:35 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: chief_bigfoot
Nothing that a framing hammer won’t fix.
14
posted on
07/17/2007 5:16:49 AM PDT
by
P8riot
(I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
To: chief_bigfoot
Cultural Marxism
15
posted on
07/17/2007 5:17:09 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Satan is working both sides of the street in World Socialism and World Courts.)
To: july4thfreedomfoundation
Or how about an artwork that mocks Mohammad?
To: chief_bigfoot
It’s a temper tantrum from a talentless lefty.
17
posted on
07/17/2007 5:26:37 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: gridlock
Is there anything more boring and predictable than an artist who tries to shock our sensibilities by being vulgar? The original prototype, "Doodie-head," didn't illicit the level of shock desired.
18
posted on
07/17/2007 5:39:19 AM PDT
by
Sax
To: mewzilla
19
posted on
07/17/2007 5:51:06 AM PDT
by
Theo
(Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
To: drew
20
posted on
07/17/2007 5:58:46 AM PDT
by
euroman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson