Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Govenor Kaine Shuns Special Sesson
The Washington Times ^ | July 14, 2007 | Seth McLaughlin

Posted on 07/16/2007 5:52:36 PM PDT by MosesKnows

Kaine shuns special session to repeal 'abuser fees'

July 14, 2007

By Seth McLaughlin

The first paragraph
Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine has no plans to call a special General Assembly session to consider repealing new fees against bad drivers, despite public outrage, a potential lawsuit and a lawmaker's demand that he do so.

The last paragraph
The governor's office estimated the new law would affect only about 2 percent of Virginians.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: fees; kaine; landmark; legislation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: iceskater

I can’t understand people on this thread who buy the idea that only 2% of the people are affected. The law applies to every Virginia resident who drives. As a citizen of this state, I think it is outrageous. This is just a huge tax hike to raise revenue that could not otherwise be raised through the legislature.


41 posted on 07/17/2007 9:36:25 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Good point. There are many areas in Virginia that see a lot of out of state drivers: northern Virginia certainly sees a lot of DC and Maryland plates. Williamsburg would be another area that comes to mind. In addition, think of all the colleges in Virginia with out of state students. How fair is it if you have two college students in Virginia driving drunk or recklessly, the same circumstances for each, and one is punished more harshly because he or she is a state resident? I guess the out of state student can always respond that they’ll trade “civil remedial fines” for in state tuition any day....


42 posted on 07/17/2007 9:37:38 AM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GraceCoolidge

Your college student example is an excellent point, as are the other areas you mention. I live just 8 miles from the MD line, even in the winter there are nearly as many out of state plates in the parking lot of the supermarket as there are in state.

There’s a major campground a few miles west of me on the Chesapeake and so I daily see the number of out of state plates. The intersection at the edge of my property sees accidents on a regular basis, and 9 times out of 10, at least one of the vehicles involved will have out of state plates.


43 posted on 07/17/2007 9:48:38 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kabar; Gabz; Corin Stormhands; R. Scott

They did the abuser fee instead of increasing the gas tax. They didn’t want to take the heat for increasing the tax on gasoline.

There IS another alternative. They could reduce spending in other areas. If roads are a priority, then by definition, other things are not as high a priority. With limited resources, then things that are not a high priority should not be funded. Yet, in spite of massive increases in revenue, the General Assembly could not manage to find enough money to deal with roads. Governor Gridlock and his RINO henchmen in the GA make me sick.


44 posted on 07/17/2007 9:58:25 AM PDT by iceskater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I think the fees “attach” to the driver’s license not the particular vehicle involved in the infraction. The way I understand it, the abuser fees are tied to the ‘points’ on your drivers license. So, if you were driving someone else’s car, you would deal with the abuser fees, not the owner of the car.


45 posted on 07/17/2007 10:01:00 AM PDT by iceskater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

My bad, then. Did he change it based on legal advice or for some other reason?

I still think the only fair way to raise money for roads is through the gas tax. You drive a lot and put more stress on the roads, you pay more. And it doesn’t matter whether or not you live here. Reduce some other non-road tax in return.


46 posted on 07/17/2007 10:03:50 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: iceskater

It’s a bad law and trying to sell it based on the fact that only 2% of the population is affected is nonsense. The law applies to every resident of Virginia.


47 posted on 07/17/2007 10:06:40 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CORedneck

Hmm. Surprised I’ve never heard of that. Thanks.


48 posted on 07/17/2007 10:21:20 AM PDT by TheZMan (Texas is no place for pansy-ass liberals. Ya'll move back to California er Mexico er somethin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: iceskater

That is where my confusion/question is arising. The “fees” are to be paid in the annual “installments” when you go to renew the plates on your car at DMV. If they are “attached” to your DL, when is the state going to collect them. My DL is not up for renewal until 2010, and I do not own a vehicle.

I am eagerly anticipating the first court challenge to this, I don’t think it is going to hold up.

For me personally this has no bearing, as I have no points on my DL and haven’t for many, many years. It’s the principle of it that has me up in arms.


49 posted on 07/17/2007 10:23:31 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad; kabar; Gabz; R. Scott

I think it’s probably legitimate that he changed it for legal reasons. The reality is, he should have stricken it from the plan. But it’s what he’s called for since he came into office. He just managed to work things out so that the Republicans get the heat for “offering” this.

Bottom line is, it’s NOT NEEDED. They’ve been spending money like drunken sailors for years. What they need is fiscal accountability.

There was NEVER a budget crisis. Just over spending.


50 posted on 07/17/2007 10:27:14 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I drink coffee for your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

That’s a good question. Another reason why this law is an abomination.


51 posted on 07/17/2007 10:28:39 AM PDT by iceskater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: iceskater

meant to ping you to #50


52 posted on 07/17/2007 10:30:24 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I drink coffee for your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
Why should 2% of Virginians bear the burden of this new method of taxation?

Why shouldn't fines be heavy for shitty drivers? I live in Fayetteville NC the home of shitty drivers. I have almost been run over countless times, running red lights etc. Fines should be heavy to get those mo fos off the road. It is not a "right" to drive reckless.

That being said it should apply to anyone driving in Virginia.

53 posted on 07/17/2007 10:31:03 AM PDT by JackDanielsOldNo7 (On guard until the seal is broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; gracesdad; kabar; R. Scott
I think it’s probably legitimate that he changed it for legal reasons.

What possible legal reasons? It doesn't make sense. Is it tied to vehicle registration, which appears the way they expect it to be paid, or to DLs? If it is tied to DLs, which it appears to because of points acrrued, it could easily be applied to those with out of state DLs. But if tied to vehicle registration, the included method of payment, it then becomes a tax only on a certain segment of the population, those who own vehicles.

Unlike non-smokers who are all for raising cigarette taxes, these fees do not personally concern me(no points on my DL and no vehicle registered in my name), yet I am still opposed to them.

54 posted on 07/17/2007 10:35:39 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Ok so next time you fail to signal you’re ok with a $1000 fine and a tax of $50 per point per year for the next 11 years all to “raise revenue” as stated in the passed law.


55 posted on 07/17/2007 10:36:09 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

I think all of those concerns you raise are valid. And that’s why you’re right, it won’t hold up in court.


56 posted on 07/17/2007 10:42:00 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I drink coffee for your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

“I am eagerly anticipating the first court challenge to this, I don’t think it is going to hold up.”

I don’t think you can get a jury in traffic court. And I’m not sure if you can even appeal.


57 posted on 07/17/2007 10:44:46 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

I really hope I’m right, I really do.


58 posted on 07/17/2007 10:47:51 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
I don’t think you can get a jury in traffic court. And I’m not sure if you can even appeal.

Why ever not?

The last time my husband got a traffic ticket he asked for and received a jury trial. His ticket was thrown out and both the cop and the prosecutor got chewed out by the judge. he was ticketed for running a red light, yet on the stand the cop admitted he had made a right turn on a yellow light, which is perfectly legal in Delaware, as is right turns on red lights.

Neither he nor I have ever been ticketed in Virginia, but I do not see why there would be no appeal process.

59 posted on 07/17/2007 10:52:14 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf; Gabz
I don’t think you can get a jury in traffic court.

The difference might be that these are civil penalties, not fines. But I'm no legal expert.

60 posted on 07/17/2007 10:52:51 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I drink coffee for your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson