Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rodney King
This case had nothing to do with his underlying claims, just whether or not he "willfully" failed to file. Since he really, really believed this stuff, the jury ruled that he was not "willful". That is, he didn't actually believe he had to file.

Has anyone asked the jury why they acquitted him. If so, I'd like to read what the jury had to say. Absent any questioning of the jury after the verdict, one cannot conclude the decision was based soley on the "willful" element.

66 posted on 07/15/2007 10:42:22 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan
Has anyone asked the jury why they acquitted him. If so, I'd like to read what the jury had to say. Absent any questioning of the jury after the verdict, one cannot conclude the decision was based soley on the "willful" element.

Well, that is the law he was acquitted of. It may be that they simply acquitted him because they agree with him in general.

67 posted on 07/15/2007 10:43:47 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson