[Rodney King]

Has anyone asked the jury why they acquitted him. If so, I'd like to read what the jury had to say. Absent any questioning of the jury after the verdict, one cannot conclude the decision was based soley on the "willful" element.

Well, that is the law he was acquitted of. It may be that they simply acquitted him because they agree with him in general.

[Raycpa]

You are giving truth to the “true believers”. “True believers” don’t desire truth, they simply want their fantasy and they are willing to pay big bucks for it.

Quit trying to screw up some other guys market.

I suppose you also tell people that Tarrot Card readers and crsytal ball fortune tellers are scam artists too.

You should be ashamed.

[SeaHawkFan]

and it could have been that the jury agreed with him that none of the three elemants of the crime were committed.

In any event, this was a huge loss for the IRS. Keep in mind that they pretty much left him alone until he wrote a book. He was daring them to charge him by being “in you face” with the IRS. He wanted to prove his point in a court of law and called the bluff of the IRS.